2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42098-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning Approach for the Identification of a Biomarker of Human Pain using fNIRS

Abstract: Pain is a highly unpleasant sensory and emotional experience, and no objective diagnosis test exists to assess it. In clinical practice there are two main methods for the estimation of pain, a patient’s self-report and clinical judgement. However, these methods are highly subjective and the need of biomarkers to measure pain is important to improve pain management, reduce risk factors, and contribute to a more objective, valid, and reliable diagnosis. Therefore, in this study we propose the use of functional n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection criteria was based on the joint mutual information algorithm (JMI), this method ranks the features with the largest mutual information (MI) that produces most of the MI between the feature vector and the class label (Yang and Moody, 1999). The reason to choose JMI is that it presents better tradeoff in terms of accuracy, stability, and flexibility than other ranking methods (Brown et al, 2012;Rojas et al, 2019b). A disadvantage of this method is the fact that there is no stopping criteria to reach the best subset of features, and the user needs to select the number of features from the ranking list to form the optimal subset.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The selection criteria was based on the joint mutual information algorithm (JMI), this method ranks the features with the largest mutual information (MI) that produces most of the MI between the feature vector and the class label (Yang and Moody, 1999). The reason to choose JMI is that it presents better tradeoff in terms of accuracy, stability, and flexibility than other ranking methods (Brown et al, 2012;Rojas et al, 2019b). A disadvantage of this method is the fact that there is no stopping criteria to reach the best subset of features, and the user needs to select the number of features from the ranking list to form the optimal subset.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of feature selection is to find a good representation of the data, improve estimators' performance by reducing the dimensionality of the data and eliminating redundant and irrelevant data from each participant's data (Rojas et al, 2019b). After applying joint mutual information (JMI), the features were ranked according to the their relevance to the class label.…”
Section: Feature Selection Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fNIRS is a non-invasive technique that has shown to be very useful in the evaluation of brain activity in response to pain stimuli. In [263], fNIRS was proposed as a biomarker of pain in conjunction with machine learning algorithms. Allodynia and motor loss of fibromyalgia patients has been related to alterations in the upper parietal gyrus bilateral region detected by fNIRS [264].…”
Section: Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy (Fnirs) and Chronic Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chi-square test measures dependence between stochastic variables. It also checked whether a feature was statistically significantly associated with the class label under the assumption of a chi-squared distribution (Bangdiwala, 2016;Fernandez Rojas et al, 2019).…”
Section: Filter Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%