2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A machine learning based model for Out of Hospital cardiac arrest outcome classification and sensitivity analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aschauer et al discovered that using 21 variables, an LR model obtained an average AUC of 0.827 for survival probability, with key predictors being prehospital variables, such as the number of minutes to sustained restoration of spontaneous circulation and the first rhythm [ 29 ]. Another study cohort with 2639 patients, comparing several ML models (including decision tree, random forest (RF), k -nearest neighbors, XGB, light gradient boosting machine (GBM), and neural networks), stated that an embedded fully convolutional network model has the best average class sensitivity of 0.825 for neurological outcome prediction [ 18 ]. However, the above models required knowledge of the periods of time with circulatory no-flow and low-flow, limiting its use when prehospital data are unknown or recalled incorrectly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Aschauer et al discovered that using 21 variables, an LR model obtained an average AUC of 0.827 for survival probability, with key predictors being prehospital variables, such as the number of minutes to sustained restoration of spontaneous circulation and the first rhythm [ 29 ]. Another study cohort with 2639 patients, comparing several ML models (including decision tree, random forest (RF), k -nearest neighbors, XGB, light gradient boosting machine (GBM), and neural networks), stated that an embedded fully convolutional network model has the best average class sensitivity of 0.825 for neurological outcome prediction [ 18 ]. However, the above models required knowledge of the periods of time with circulatory no-flow and low-flow, limiting its use when prehospital data are unknown or recalled incorrectly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have suggested that ML methods could predict neurologic and survival outcomes of OHCA patients [18][19][20][21]. Harford et al found that an ML model can be used to support intervention decisions such as CPR or coronary angiography in OHCA patients [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[36][37][38] Several ML algorithms used EMS data to predict outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. [39][40][41][42] Another intervention used supervised ML to automatically link EMS electronic patient care reports to ED records. 43 The out-of-hospital setting presents a unique setting where limited clinical variables are used to make prompt decisions (for example, whether or not to transport to hospital).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of studies in the out‐of‐hospital environment included demand forecast for allocation of ambulances, classification of out‐of‐hospital ECGs, and screening of EMS calls to recognize cardiac arrest 36–38 . Several ML algorithms used EMS data to predict outcomes for out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest 39–42 . Another intervention used supervised ML to automatically link EMS electronic patient care reports to ED records 43 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%