2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1949159/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A machine learning model for prediction of successful extubation in patients admitted to the intensive care unit

Abstract: Background and objective: Successful weaning from mechanical ventilation is important for patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs); however, models for predicting real-time weaning outcomes remain inadequate. Therefore, this study was designed to develop a machine learning model using time series ventilator-derived parameters with good accuracy for predicting successful extubation. Methods Patients with mechanical ventilation between August 2015 and November 2020 admitted Yuanlin Christian Hospital i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could guide attention towards critical patients, and may caution clinicians from prematurely extubating patients. For the prediction of extubation failure, various models have been proposed [36][37][38][39][40][41] . The largest cohorts to date were used in the works by Zhao et al 41 , who only validated the model in a cardiac ICU cohort, which limits the generalizability of the results, and Chen et al 42 , who restricted the evaluation to ROC-based metrics only, which makes clinical interpretation difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could guide attention towards critical patients, and may caution clinicians from prematurely extubating patients. For the prediction of extubation failure, various models have been proposed [36][37][38][39][40][41] . The largest cohorts to date were used in the works by Zhao et al 41 , who only validated the model in a cardiac ICU cohort, which limits the generalizability of the results, and Chen et al 42 , who restricted the evaluation to ROC-based metrics only, which makes clinical interpretation difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%