2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.826760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Machine Learning-Modified Novel Nomogram to Predict Perioperative Blood Transfusion of Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Abstract: BackgroundPerioperative blood transfusion reserves are limited, and the outcome of blood transfusion remains unclear. Therefore, it is important to prepare plans for perioperative blood transfusions. This study aimed to establish a risk assessment model to guide clinical patient management.MethodsThis retrospective comparative study involving 513 patients who had total gastrectomy (TG) between January 2018 and January 2021 was conducted using propensity score matching (PSM). The influencing factors were explor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we investigated, the optimal model, CatBoost algorithm, was superior to LR with an AUC of 0.752 (CatBoost) vs. 0.666 (LR), implying intraoperative RBC transfusion is not simply linearly related to preoperative risk factors based on our dataset. Undoubtedly, with the proficiency of artificial intelligence in handling nonlinear prediction tasks, more and more machine learning models are being used to predict transfusions in a series of different diseases, offering new approaches to improve clinical outcomes ( 22 , 23 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we investigated, the optimal model, CatBoost algorithm, was superior to LR with an AUC of 0.752 (CatBoost) vs. 0.666 (LR), implying intraoperative RBC transfusion is not simply linearly related to preoperative risk factors based on our dataset. Undoubtedly, with the proficiency of artificial intelligence in handling nonlinear prediction tasks, more and more machine learning models are being used to predict transfusions in a series of different diseases, offering new approaches to improve clinical outcomes ( 22 , 23 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of ML algorithms, including regression-based methods, decision-tree based methods (i.e. decision trees [DT], Random Forests [RF], eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGB] implementation), neural networks (NN), Naïve Bayes and support vector machines (SVM) have been used in the prognostication of patients in the general peri-operative [11][12][13][14][15][16] and peri-HF [17][18][19][20] period with varying degrees of success. However, most of these tools require data that is not readily available on admission (such as intra-operative data and laboratory data), much like the tools developed from traditional statistical methods and most do not predict short-term in-hospital mortality following HF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%