2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A machine learning strategy for computing interface curvature in Front-Tracking methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This idea [39,68,69] could free us from hand-tuning hκ * min in Algorithms 1 to 3 and possibly hκ up min in the MLCurvature() function. Lastly, we could include data from neighboring interface nodes, analogous to [40], but as analytical constraints [70]. This way, we could enforce some smoothness and reduce sharp curvature variations between "successive" nodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This idea [39,68,69] could free us from hand-tuning hκ * min in Algorithms 1 to 3 and possibly hκ up min in the MLCurvature() function. Lastly, we could include data from neighboring interface nodes, analogous to [40], but as analytical constraints [70]. This way, we could enforce some smoothness and reduce sharp curvature variations between "successive" nodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their ML solution has worked well for under-resolved regions while preserving the numerical convergence around well-resolved sectors. Also, Franc ¸a and Oishi [40] have recently introduced a neural strategy motivated by [33] for calculating curvature in front-tracking. Their multilayer perceptrons [34,35] simply consume normal-and tangential-vector angles to emit curvature estimates at the marker points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven strategies have recently shown their powerful ability across diverse fields including the fluid mechanics communities [10,11], and a few attempts introducing machine-learning (ML) techniques have also appeared in multiphase flow simulation fields. Qi et al [12], Larios-Cárdenas and Gibou [13], and Franca and Oishi [14] utilized ML strategies to compute the interface curvature for volume of fluid (VOF), level set (LS), and front tracking (FT) simulations, respectively. Ataei et al [15] also used ML to replace the conventional iterative computation for the piecewise linear interface construction (PLIC) in VOF simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ataei et al [15] also used ML to replace the conventional iterative computation for the piecewise linear interface construction (PLIC) in VOF simulation. Although a very few studies are available in literature and those are still at initial stages, they have demonstrated the potential of ML strategies in multiphase flow simulations [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like these, there have been other contemporary deep learning implementations devoted to solving geometrical difficulties in conventional numerical schemes. These include, for instance, the curvature prediction from angular and normal-vector information [50] in front-tracking and the neural calculation of linear piecewise interface construction (PLIC [51]) coefficients [52] in the VOF method. Likewise, one can find advancements in the level-set framework, such as Buhendwa, Bezgin, and Adams' consistent algorithms for inferring area fractions and apertures for IR [53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%