A macrohistorical geography of rural drinking water institutions in India

Abstract

India has a long history of policies that aim to improve rural drinking water services, in part through decentralization that faces deeply rooted institutional challenges. These include debates about: the duty of the state to provide rural drinking water supply; tension over the role of central, state, and local governments; and frequent changes in policy and senior public officials that disrupt long-term implementation. Some water governance theorists have described policymaking in this context as a pragmatic process of bricolage, that is, of piecing together practical opportunities for improvement where possible. This paper takes a macrohistorical geographic approach to these institutional problems, with an emphasis on northern India. It shows that ancient sources dating back to the Arthashastra have underscored the role of the state in developing water supplies for the people. Subsequent regimes have argued for various combinations of centralized and local responsibility. We show that frequent rotation of senior public officials was systematized in the 16 th century Mughal empire. Changing roles of India's five levels of center, state, district, block, and village government have a half-millennium-long history, evolving through dramatically different Mughal, Mahratta, colonial, and post-colonial contexts. Devolution policies were frequently changed in the colonial period. Independence in

District Drinking Water Planning for Sustainability in Maharashtra: Between Local and Global Scales

“…Many if not most of these large-scale organizations advocate bottom-up drinking water planning in principle. However, research on their institutional history reveals that even this subsidiarity principle has involved top-down processes [21]. During the colonial period, for example, state statutes listed drinking water and sanitation as a local government responsibility.…”

“…They have also varied on which of the three levels of Panchayati Raj local government has primacy-the district, block, or gram panchayat. As a separate study reviewed these long-term institutional processes, this section concentrates on current top-down policy results [21].…”

“…In either case they need to be sustained on the ground if a water system is to operate for decades, long after it has been designed and built. A widespread institutional challenge in India involves frequent changes in water policies and officers [21]. At the local level, institutional rules are developed by Village Water Supply Committees (VWSCs), which are sub-committees of Gram Panchayats, but sometimes have limited capacity.…”

“…Some of these materials argue for districts as the principal level of intermediate governance, while others prefer blocks. A separate study has retraced the historical geography of these rural drinking water institutions in India [21]. It highlighted the role of the state in drinking water supply, identified the five enduring levels of water governance, and underscored the challenges associated with frequent changes in officer postings and policies.…”

Geographies of big water infrastructure: Contemporary insights and future research opportunities

“…This body of work demonstrates the ongoing aspects of resistance that operate in accord with the continued assembly of big water infrastructures' maintenance (Barnes, 2017) and the bricolage practices of state planners and local users (Wescoat et al, 2021) as infrastructure continues to transform and to be transformed into the future.…”