2013
DOI: 10.4192/1577-8517-v13_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Management Model for Integrating SOA and XBRL

Abstract: Abstract. The alignment and adaptation of business processes with organizational strategies require a high level of effort affecting several businesses. This is caused by the low level of flexibility in information systems to changes in business requirements. Another problem encountered in organizations is the diversity of data formats that are related to financial information, since these are stored in heterogeneous computer systems. An adaptive and structured IT environment can influence the improvment of fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the early studies focus on the introduction of XBRL along with its benefits and address the potential effects of XBRL on stakeholders such as companies, regulators, and investors (e.g., Baldwin et al, 2006;Burnett et al, 2006;Cohen et al, 2005). Another stream of research addresses technical aspects of XBRL including taxonomy development (e.g., Bovee et al, 2002;Cohen, 2004;Zhu & Wu, 2011), XBRL adoption (e.g., Garbellotto, 2010;Janvrin & No, 2012;Pinsker & Li, 2008), and other technical issues on XBRL development (e.g., Amrhein et al, 2009;Boritz & No, 2005;Moreira & Silva 2013). Previous literature has also examined the quality of XBRL-tagged data (e.g., Bartley et al, 2010;Boritz & No, 2008;Du et al, 2013) and discussed assurance issues on XBRL-tagged data (e.g., Boritz & No, 2009;Plumlee & Plumlee, 2008;Srivastava & Kogan, 2010).…”
Section: Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the early studies focus on the introduction of XBRL along with its benefits and address the potential effects of XBRL on stakeholders such as companies, regulators, and investors (e.g., Baldwin et al, 2006;Burnett et al, 2006;Cohen et al, 2005). Another stream of research addresses technical aspects of XBRL including taxonomy development (e.g., Bovee et al, 2002;Cohen, 2004;Zhu & Wu, 2011), XBRL adoption (e.g., Garbellotto, 2010;Janvrin & No, 2012;Pinsker & Li, 2008), and other technical issues on XBRL development (e.g., Amrhein et al, 2009;Boritz & No, 2005;Moreira & Silva 2013). Previous literature has also examined the quality of XBRL-tagged data (e.g., Bartley et al, 2010;Boritz & No, 2008;Du et al, 2013) and discussed assurance issues on XBRL-tagged data (e.g., Boritz & No, 2009;Plumlee & Plumlee, 2008;Srivastava & Kogan, 2010).…”
Section: Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the non-standardized reporting elements for nonfinancial reporting needed to be replaced by a taxonomy. The Global Reporting Initiative started to develop a sustainability framework, which was translated into an XBRL taxonomy (Moreira and da Silva, 2013).…”
Section: Framework Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%