A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: The case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile

Cultural Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: Understanding Bundles, Trade‐Offs, and Synergies

“…; Nahuelhual et al . ), sense of place (e.g., Trentelman ; Ardoin et al . ), and mental health (e.g., Bratman et al .…”

“…Intangible benefits, or cultural ecosystem services (CES), are harder (but not impossible) to measure using approaches that recognize the difficulties of aggregating human values and deliberately maintain a plurality of perspectives and epistemologies (Chan et al 2012b;Satz et al 2013). Assessments of CES now cover topics such as recreation (e.g., Driver & Knopf 1977;Chan et al 2006), culture and heritage (e.g., Tengberg et al 2012;Nahuelhual et al 2014), sense of place (e.g., Trentelman 2009;Ardoin et al 2012), and mental health (e.g., Bratman et al 2012;, and promise to contribute to more resilient strategies for ecosystem management (Chan et al 2012a). So far, however, incorporation of CES into decisionmaking-from landscape management to international policy-has been minimal in comparison to more tangible ES, such as food provision and climate regulation, despite continuous recognition of the value of CES and the instrumental role they play in securing public support for the protection of ecosystems (Daniel et al 2012;Wolff et al 2015).…”

Linking soils to ecosystem services — A global review

“…Several studies explored the spatial aspects of ecosystem services at varying levels of detail (e.g., Grêt-Regamey et al, 2007;Kandziora et al, 2013;Nahuelhual et al, 2014;Nelson et al, 2009) (Table 3). The maps have been used at different levels of decision making and policy support Hauck et al, 2013;Maes et al, 2012).…”

Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review

“…Furthermore, the review showed that almost all selected indicators useful for CES were proxies (Table 7), like the presence of particular physical features (Raudsepp-Hearne et al, 2010;Nahuelhual et al, 2013Nahuelhual et al, , 2014 or set of indicators used within hedonic pricing assessments (Sander and Haight, 2012).…”

“…However, urban areas were never the precise contexts of the indicators, that were mainly calculated for regional (i.e. Nahuelhual et al, 2014;Frank et al, 2014), national (Weyland and Laterra, 2014) or continent (i.e. Norton et al, 2012) level.…”