Posthuman Research Practices in Education 2016
DOI: 10.1057/9781137453082_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mark on Paper: The Matter of Indigenous-Settler History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anderson calls on the tribal proverbial saying: ‘ Waikato taniwha rau, he piko he taniwha, he piko he taniwha ’ as this refers to the many bends in the Waikato river and how around every bend another leader could be identified. Anderson (Monk et al., , p. x) honours the river ‘as the source of sustenance for the people.’ His honouring and speaking the river illustrates what Jones and Hoskins (, p. 79) state as not only the use of a metaphor for Māori, but a ‘visceral identification’ as an embodying of the river. Such embodied knowing becomes possible because:
Māori everyday life is shaped by awareness of the human‐non‐human dynamic … to talk about a river, a mountain, an entire tribe, or an ancestor that lived hundreds of years ago, as yourself: ‘ko au te awa, ko te awa ko au’ (‘I am the river and the river is me’).
…”
Section: Whakapapa (Background/history) Of a Counselling Programmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anderson calls on the tribal proverbial saying: ‘ Waikato taniwha rau, he piko he taniwha, he piko he taniwha ’ as this refers to the many bends in the Waikato river and how around every bend another leader could be identified. Anderson (Monk et al., , p. x) honours the river ‘as the source of sustenance for the people.’ His honouring and speaking the river illustrates what Jones and Hoskins (, p. 79) state as not only the use of a metaphor for Māori, but a ‘visceral identification’ as an embodying of the river. Such embodied knowing becomes possible because:
Māori everyday life is shaped by awareness of the human‐non‐human dynamic … to talk about a river, a mountain, an entire tribe, or an ancestor that lived hundreds of years ago, as yourself: ‘ko au te awa, ko te awa ko au’ (‘I am the river and the river is me’).
…”
Section: Whakapapa (Background/history) Of a Counselling Programmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Unlike whakaaro Māori, Bennett (, p. xiii) does not see the material vibrancy of matter as a spiritual supplement or ‘life force.’ A Māori ontology takes it for granted that objects can ‘speak, act and have effects independently of human thought and will’ (Jones & Hoskins, , p. 78) because of a mauri (life force) that is ascribed to an object. From a new materialist viewpoint, the materiality of place‐space, beams, wood, and taonga (treasure, gift), each become ‘an agentive and productive factor in its own right’ (Barad, , p. 225).…”
Section: A Placementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an international context, another illustrative research can be about learning from and with indigenous ontologies, such as those from the Maoris, studied by Jones and Hoskins (2016). These studies show that it might be wise to engage with nonhumans in interminable tension, which is both positive and necessary.…”
Section: Expanding Literacies From a Posthuman Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…accentuate what has not yet become known. As Maori scholars, Jones and Hoskins (2016) illuminate this notion by discussing how the facial tattooing of a Maori leader, Hongi Hika, requires a "radical collapse of the subject-object dualism" (JONES; HOSKINS, 2016, p. 77) to "meet the drawing in organic fashion, that is, placing the Maori leader as a 'speaking subject' instead of a mere object of study". Abounding genealogical traces and narratives are part of the active engagement with Hongi Hika and the viewers who are also participant in this encounter.…”
Section: Expanding Literacies From a Posthuman Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their instruments and methodologies, and proper names, could effectively destroy the important values, stories and secrets, which, among other things, made possible the invention of precisely these instruments and methodologies (Jones & Hoskins, 2016). Methodologies and philosophies with no name pose a clear challenge not only to deterministic desires for knowing in a human-centric world, but to subject↔object relations.…”
Section: Capacities and Potentiality Of Subject↔object Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%