2010
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2010.2052825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Marked Point Process for Modeling Lidar Waveforms

Abstract: Abstract-Lidar waveforms are 1D signals representing a train of echoes caused by reflections at different targets. Modeling these echoes with the appropriate parametric function is useful to retrieve information about the physical characteristics of the targets. This paper presents a new probabilistic model based on a marked point process which reconstructs the echoes from recorded discrete waveforms as a sequence of parametric curves. Such an approach allows to fit each mode of a waveform with the most suitab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future interesting work would be to implement other Configuration, Kernel and Energy models, in embedding spaces of other dimensions (1D signals (Hernandez-Marin et al, 2007;Mallet et al, 2010), 3D ellipses (Perrin et al, 2006)...) or even in a non-MPP context, for instance to optimize a 3D triangulation over the noisy heightfield of photogrammetric Digital Surface Model. Our wish is that the open-source license of the librjmcmc library will enable reproducible research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future interesting work would be to implement other Configuration, Kernel and Energy models, in embedding spaces of other dimensions (1D signals (Hernandez-Marin et al, 2007;Mallet et al, 2010), 3D ellipses (Perrin et al, 2006)...) or even in a non-MPP context, for instance to optimize a 3D triangulation over the noisy heightfield of photogrammetric Digital Surface Model. Our wish is that the open-source license of the librjmcmc library will enable reproducible research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method is considered challenging in the case of echoes with low signal strength (low SNR) and it is deficient in its calculation of the cross-section in complex waveforms. The method also requires initial determination of the number of targets [16,18,23,26], which is sometimes impractical or of high computational cost. In addition, a symmetric function might not always be sufficiently accurate to describe the target characteristics [17,27].…”
Section: Decomposition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A low rate of height underestimation in the CHM generation was reported by the authors. A set of parametric pulse shapes (the Burr, Nakagami and generalized Gaussian models) have been considered by Mallet et al [23], where it was pointed out that the efficacy of the approach when applied to object classification was inadequate. However, more accurate results could be achieved when these waveform features were utilized in combination with geometric attributes.…”
Section: Decomposition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are described with respect to a reference point process, which is usually defined as the Poisson point process. In our model, we integrate interactions between adjacent objects by using Gibbs point processes, which are also applied in (Stoica et al, 2004), (Mallet et al, 2010) and others. In this setting the object configuration is described by a probability density function h which is related to a Gibbs energy U(.)…”
Section: Marked Point Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%