2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11036-019-01440-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Market in Dream: the Rapid Development of Anonymous Cybercrime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tactic of “doxxing” is one example that could be weaponised by actors ascertaining and revealing the identity of rivals in ways that could compromise their physical safety (e.g., de Bruijne et al, 2017). Cryptomarket researchers have suggested that denial of service (DoS) attacks have been launched against those running competitor sites (Moeller et al, 2017; Zhou et al, 2020). If these claims are accurate, they represent examples of cybercrime groups using cyber-attacks against the infrastructure of rival groups in an attempt to monopolise or gain market share within highly profitable online illicit markets.…”
Section: Revisiting Organised Cybercrimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tactic of “doxxing” is one example that could be weaponised by actors ascertaining and revealing the identity of rivals in ways that could compromise their physical safety (e.g., de Bruijne et al, 2017). Cryptomarket researchers have suggested that denial of service (DoS) attacks have been launched against those running competitor sites (Moeller et al, 2017; Zhou et al, 2020). If these claims are accurate, they represent examples of cybercrime groups using cyber-attacks against the infrastructure of rival groups in an attempt to monopolise or gain market share within highly profitable online illicit markets.…”
Section: Revisiting Organised Cybercrimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) Transaction costs. If the coordinated attack is the result of a collaboration or cooperation of different actors, than this cooperation contains transaction costs [6,99]. From Transaction Cost Economics these costs contain costs of working together, sharing profit, not knowing whether you could trust the other party, etc.…”
Section: Benefits Of Coordination For Cybercriminalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) Transaction costs. If the coordinated attack is the result of a collaboration or cooperation of different actors, than this cooperation contains transaction costs [6,99]. From Transaction Cost Economics these costs contain costs of working together, sharing profit, not knowing whether you could trust the other party, etc.…”
Section: Benefits Of Coordination For Cybercriminalsmentioning
confidence: 99%