2020
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1738207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Markov Mixed-Effect Multinomial Logistic Regression Model for Nominal Repeated Measures with an Application to Syntactic Self-Priming Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models of syntactic priming differ in how they account for the inverse preference effect (Chang, 2009; Chang et al, 2006; Cho et al, 2020; MacDonald, 2013; Reitter et al, 2011), though several borrow components from models of action production (e.g., Anderson et al, 2004; Botvinick & Plaut, 2004; Pomerleau, 1991). This overlap suggests an anticipation of domain-general effects of reuse, such as those reported here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Models of syntactic priming differ in how they account for the inverse preference effect (Chang, 2009; Chang et al, 2006; Cho et al, 2020; MacDonald, 2013; Reitter et al, 2011), though several borrow components from models of action production (e.g., Anderson et al, 2004; Botvinick & Plaut, 2004; Pomerleau, 1991). This overlap suggests an anticipation of domain-general effects of reuse, such as those reported here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This overlap suggests an anticipation of domain-general effects of reuse, such as those reported here. It has recently been argued that activation-based theories may be better suited to account for self-priming effects, which arguably are prevalent in both domains (see Cho et al, 2020). While our findings cannot adjudicate between alternative models, we see the current study, with its focus on commonalities across quite different domains, as a useful step in further understanding changes in behaviour that can be described as priming or hysteresis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linear mixed effect regression model will be applied to compare intervention arms against the control at baseline and stimulated measures for the HPA axis or the retinal-SCN-pineal axis comprising cortisol, melatonin, and sAA [106]. Baseline characteristics of patients from each group will be compared applying independent t tests, 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA, and the Fisher exact test.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%