2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mass-preserving interface-correction level set/ghost fluid method for modeling of three-dimensional boiling flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these, diffuse interface models [22][23][24][25][26] are being developed with various levels of sophistication to account for unresolved mesoscale mixing, even if many challenges are still present regarding the validity of these closures. To investigate the details of separated flows, Eulerian interface capturing methods, such as level set (LS) [27], Volume of Fluid (VOF) [28], and Coupled Level Set and Volume of Fluid (CLSVOF) [29][30][31][32][33], have been progressively developed and improved, achieving nowadays high accuracy in mass conservation, surface tension force evaluation and phase change. However, all these models become numerically challenging and computationally expensive when large thermophysical properties variations are involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, diffuse interface models [22][23][24][25][26] are being developed with various levels of sophistication to account for unresolved mesoscale mixing, even if many challenges are still present regarding the validity of these closures. To investigate the details of separated flows, Eulerian interface capturing methods, such as level set (LS) [27], Volume of Fluid (VOF) [28], and Coupled Level Set and Volume of Fluid (CLSVOF) [29][30][31][32][33], have been progressively developed and improved, achieving nowadays high accuracy in mass conservation, surface tension force evaluation and phase change. However, all these models become numerically challenging and computationally expensive when large thermophysical properties variations are involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one-fluid method is sometimes termed direct numerical simulation for a two-phase system, as no assumptions or models for the interface shape are employed [16,17]. The one-fluid methods are classified into: sharp interface, such as Level-Set (LS) [18] and Volume-of-Fluid (VoF) [19,20], and diffuse interface, such as phase-field [21]. The one-fluid methods are applied for the simulation of a single vapor bubble condensation widely, but the main challenge in such numerical simulations is a reliable and physical computation of the mass transfer through the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensions of LS methods have been reported in [47,50,48,49,44]. [23,35,54] combine LS method and ghost-fluid approach [25] to incorporate jump conditions in two-phase flow with phase change. Further efforts in the framework of coupled VoF-LS methods were reported in [36,56,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%