2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03447-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A matched-pair analysis comparing stereotactic radiosurgery with whole-brain radiotherapy for patients with multiple brain metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, while use of SRT was restricted to patients with 1-3 metastases in the past, it is currently being extended with equivalent OS results for up to 10 BM, and its role for >10 BM is also being reappraised. 35 , 39 , 40 , 41 Emerging individualized concepts for extensive, polytopic brain involvement include SRT for the symptomatic, largest or fastest progressing lesions, in analogy to the concept of oligoprogression, 42 and control of the remaining BM by CNS-active systemic therapies. However, the exact workflows and patient selection criteria for application remain to be defined, ideally in the form of prospective clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, while use of SRT was restricted to patients with 1-3 metastases in the past, it is currently being extended with equivalent OS results for up to 10 BM, and its role for >10 BM is also being reappraised. 35 , 39 , 40 , 41 Emerging individualized concepts for extensive, polytopic brain involvement include SRT for the symptomatic, largest or fastest progressing lesions, in analogy to the concept of oligoprogression, 42 and control of the remaining BM by CNS-active systemic therapies. However, the exact workflows and patient selection criteria for application remain to be defined, ideally in the form of prospective clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological improvements have allowed the use of SRT treatment for multiple BM with acceptable treatment times, and SRT is no longer only suitable for patients with a limited number of BM (24). The first matched-pair analysis for potential prognostic factors, comparing SRT vs. WBRT for patients with multiple BM, confirmed these advantages, finding a median overall survival of 16 months (SRT) vs. 8 months (WBRT), while excellent clinical performance and extracranial tumor control were favorable prognostic factors (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…61 In the largest retrospective study to date, Ali et al 63 analyzed 5,750 patients treated with SRS for BM and recapitulated the findings reported by Yamamoto et al 62 Other studies have reported similar findings. 30 63 64 Moreover, in patients with more than 4 lesions, there is level 3 evidence for the use of SRS to improve overall survival when the cumulative volume is less than 7 mL. 60 These studies support consideration for SRS in the treatment of more than 4 BM in select circumstances.…”
Section: Number Of Brain Metastasesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 5 With the exception of highly radiation resistant tumors, such as melanomas and sarcomas, SRS is highly efficacious as a means of controlling BM growth. 29 30 Since SRS spares cerebrum unaffected with BM, there is a decreased likelihood of posttreatment neurocognitive decline relative to WBRT. 4 25 31 Moreover, because higher doses can typically be delivered through SRS, local control is improved relative to WBRT.…”
Section: Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%