2021
DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.jns193419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A matched-pair analysis of clinical outcomes after intracavitary cesium-131 brachytherapy versus stereotactic radiosurgery for resected brain metastases

Abstract: OBJECTIVEAdjuvant radiation therapy (RT), such as cesium-131 (Cs-131) brachytherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), reduces local recurrence (LR) of brain metastases (BM). However, SRS is less efficacious for large cavities, and the delay between surgery and SRS may permit tumor repopulation. Cs-131 has demonstrated improved local control, with reduced radiation necrosis (RN) compared to SRS. This study represents the first comparison of outcomes between Cs-131 br… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the use of adjuvant WBRT eliminates concerns over precisely where to treat, this tradeoff is increasingly unpopular clinically [2,6,7]. We and other centers investigating brain brachytherapy for metastasis believe that it may be particularly useful in larger lesions as control appears relatively independent of size [20][21][22][23]; our study results support this finding. Figure 2 shows our LC by size grouping and with only one failure.…”
Section: Local Controlsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the use of adjuvant WBRT eliminates concerns over precisely where to treat, this tradeoff is increasingly unpopular clinically [2,6,7]. We and other centers investigating brain brachytherapy for metastasis believe that it may be particularly useful in larger lesions as control appears relatively independent of size [20][21][22][23]; our study results support this finding. Figure 2 shows our LC by size grouping and with only one failure.…”
Section: Local Controlsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The major difference between these isotopes is that Cs-131 has a t ½ of 9.7 days compared to 59.4 days for I-125, and this markedly shorter half-life allows a much more rapid dose delivery, diminished time of radiation exposure, and possibly more rapid tumor control [18,19]. Published studies about Cs-131 to date have used a variety of doses and implantation techniques, and outcomes appear to match or exceed what is currently achievable with EBRT approaches [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 121 In a matched pair analysis of patients treated with SRS versus cesium-131 radioisotope brachytherapy seeds after gross total resection of a brain metastasis, the local recurrence rate was significant lower in the brachytherapy seed cohort compared to SRS. 122 …”
Section: Future Directions and Unanswered Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significantly improved DRFS was not anticipated and was speculated to be due to either delays in initiating or continuing systemic treatments for SRS patients or unaccounted differences between the two cohorts. 70 Lastly, a prospective study by Pham et al suggests that 131 Cs brachytherapy may support stable or improved functional recovery as measured by FACT-Br and MMSE scores. 71 These results are favorable given that prior studies have associated radiotherapy with post-operative neurocognitive decline.…”
Section: Surgical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%