2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1601.06116
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mathematical Formalization of Hierarchical Temporal Memory's Spatial Pooler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we focused sequence learning in this paper, the proximal synapses were fixed during learning. In principle, the proximal synapses can also adapt continuously during learning according to a spatial competitive learning rule (Hawkins et al, 2011;Mnatzaganian et al, 2016).…”
Section: Htm Activation and Learning Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we focused sequence learning in this paper, the proximal synapses were fixed during learning. In principle, the proximal synapses can also adapt continuously during learning according to a spatial competitive learning rule (Hawkins et al, 2011;Mnatzaganian et al, 2016).…”
Section: Htm Activation and Learning Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• detraction of 1 on single synapse when multiple patterns activate the same column with opposite input value on single synapse (( • permanence boosting of inputs of columns activated by different patterns, harmful effect but if duty cycle big enough (almost bigger than number of patterns), inputs will be learned • attraction (equations above) -speeding up learning • detraction (equations above) -slowing down learning In both presented situations (single and multi pattern learning) constant inhibition radius is used. According to the original Numenta algorithm the fluctuations of inhibition radius should decrease during learning process [8], but there is possibility that inhibition radius never converge to constant value. In our approach the constant inhibition radius allows to show convergence of learning process.…”
Section: N Convergence Of Spmentioning
confidence: 99%