2017
DOI: 10.1109/tci.2017.2736788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mathematical Model for Adaptive Computed Tomography Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lowdose imaging and reconstruction (with dense projection view sampling) has been more widely studied than the few-views imaging. This is probably because the former does not involve a strategy for selection of the set of view angles, which in itself is an active field of research [6,7,8]. For long, almost all of the commercial CT machines used FBP 1 as the standard reconstruction technique [9].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lowdose imaging and reconstruction (with dense projection view sampling) has been more widely studied than the few-views imaging. This is probably because the former does not involve a strategy for selection of the set of view angles, which in itself is an active field of research [6,7,8]. For long, almost all of the commercial CT machines used FBP 1 as the standard reconstruction technique [9].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, there are two lines of pursuit. One is to intelligently choose those sets of projection views that capture most information [1,2,3], and the other is to improve the reconstruction algorithms to get the most accurate recovery of the underlying slice, given the measurements from any limited set of views [4,5,6]. This paper deals with the latter scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%