1993
DOI: 10.1080/00207549308956720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mathematical model for the economic justification of setup time reduction

Abstract: A justification model for setup time reduction is presented. The model includes inventory carrying cost, setup cost, storage cost, setup time reduction cost, and quality cost. The level of setup time reduction which yields the lowest total cost indicates the extent to which setup time reduction is economically justified. A Case study is presented based on one machine and one product. Results indicate that unlimited setup time reduction is not alwaysjustified based on the analysis of one product. However, a gre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the full benefits of JIT to be realized, JIT deliveries should be matched with JIT production rather than producers stockpiling inventory to meet their customers' JIT delivery requirements. The main thesis behind having suppliers become JIT producers is that inventory hides problems and, by reducing inventory, quality problems are discovered and solved (Trevino et al 1993, Cordon 1995. Given the above arguments asserting the negative relationship between inventory and quality, it is essential that supply chain inventory models incorporate this relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the full benefits of JIT to be realized, JIT deliveries should be matched with JIT production rather than producers stockpiling inventory to meet their customers' JIT delivery requirements. The main thesis behind having suppliers become JIT producers is that inventory hides problems and, by reducing inventory, quality problems are discovered and solved (Trevino et al 1993, Cordon 1995. Given the above arguments asserting the negative relationship between inventory and quality, it is essential that supply chain inventory models incorporate this relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A number of points related to set-up reduction have been studied; for example, prioritization of set-up reduction among machines using the theory of constraints (Chakravorty and Sessun 1995), development of knowledge-based decision support systems for set-up reduction (Kim and Arinze 1992), economic justification of set-up reduction (Trevino et al 1993), and set-up reduction scheduling (Feng et al 1997). This paper is concerned with the last point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical tasks in the set-up operation include the exchange of jig/ xtures, exchanging of moulds and dies, inspection, prototype production, and adjustment. Thus set-up time can be de ned as the period of time from the last good part of the previous set-up to the rst acceptable part after the new set-up (Trevino et al 1993). In addition, the machine idle time resulted from the waiting time for the material handling device to pick up the part is also included in the set-up time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, larger lot sizes make the production system in exible and ineµ cient (Black 1991). Porteus (1985Porteus ( , 1986 and Trevino et al (1993) have also pointed out that smaller lot sizes can be economically achieved by reducing set-up time. At the same time inventory cost and material handling costs are reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%