“…Also, he gave no explicit mathematical formula for the supposed arithmetical progression for the frequencies, in both cases (even and odd multiplets). In [6], we have written the frequencies for the even multiplets, mentioned above, as the simple arithmetic progression 8 − 2k (k = 1, 2, 3), which gives 6, 4, and 2. We have therefore that the frequencies-3, 5, and 9-are in accordance with the geometrical progression 2 k + 1 when the even multiplets-6, 4, and 2-are inversely ordered by the arithmetical progression 8 − 2k, for k = 1, 2, 3.…”