1987
DOI: 10.1149/1.2100322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mathematical Model of a Lead‐Acid Cell: Discharge, Rest, and Charge

Abstract: The independent sizing of the redox system's power and storage capacity makes it particularly attractive for long term electricity storage in remote areas where solar arrays or wind generators have been installed. An attractive feature of the vanadium redox battery is that since there is no solution contamination due to crossmixing, after the original capital investment, there would be negligible running and maintenance costs. Since the cell can be completely discharged without any deterioration in performance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
144
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
9
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A model describing the cell behavior for a complete cell nas been developed. The lead-acid cell [11,12]' the LiAl/FeS molten salt battery [ 13], and the Li/SOC1 2 primary cell (14,15] have been analyzed in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A model describing the cell behavior for a complete cell nas been developed. The lead-acid cell [11,12]' the LiAl/FeS molten salt battery [ 13], and the Li/SOC1 2 primary cell (14,15] have been analyzed in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They take into account the finite rate of the charge-transfer reactions, and ohmic as well as diffusional resistances. To cite a few, Gu et al 1 7 These models can predict the discharge period of a battery once a cutoff voltage is specified. However, these models have focused on predicting the performance of the battery at normally encountered ambient temperatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charging must stop when sulfate is not available. To account for this, Gu et al 19 equated the 'effective' area available for charge transfer reaction to the actual area available for charge transfer multiplied by fraction of active material used: a = a o (1 − r ) 1.5 r . Others proposed the multiplication factor, called morphological factor, to be some function of fraction utilized: Gu et al 20 use 1 − (1 − r ) 0.55 while Srinivasan et al 21 use r 0.6 .…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%