1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3886(96)00044-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mathematical model of electrostatic field in wires-plate electrostatic precipitators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the Finite Difference Method (FDM) (McDonald et al, 1977;Lawless and Sparks, 1980), Finite Elements Method (FEM) (Cristina et al, 1991), Boundary Element Method (BEM) with the Method Of Characteristics (MOC) (Adamiak, 1994), FDM combined with MOC (Lami et al, 1997;Anagnostopoulos and Bergeles, 2002) and Finite Volume Method (FVM) (Neimarlija et al, 2009). Dirichlet conditions were imposed on the electrodes as voltage boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the Finite Difference Method (FDM) (McDonald et al, 1977;Lawless and Sparks, 1980), Finite Elements Method (FEM) (Cristina et al, 1991), Boundary Element Method (BEM) with the Method Of Characteristics (MOC) (Adamiak, 1994), FDM combined with MOC (Lami et al, 1997;Anagnostopoulos and Bergeles, 2002) and Finite Volume Method (FVM) (Neimarlija et al, 2009). Dirichlet conditions were imposed on the electrodes as voltage boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the calculated value is differed, the above calculation is repeated by changing the value of space charge density at the wire electrode until convergence. The obtained electric field and charge distribution are rechecked by the theoretical approach [23][24][25] methodology to affirm the results. Embarking an up-wind difference scheme on velocity field at all nodes are calculated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…(1) and (2), the finite-difference method (FDM) has often been used, particularly in early studies (e.g., [6,9]). However, to more accurately compute the near wire region characterized by strong gradients, other approaches have been developed: non-Cartesian FDM [8] and methods which can use unstructured grids, such as the finite-element method (FEM) [10,13] or the finite-volume method (FVM) [11]. Moreover, FEM, which is well adapted to the solution of the elliptic Poisson equation, can be combined with methods suitable for the hyperbolic equation, e.g., FEM-FDM [7], FEM-FVM [12], FEM, and method of characteristics [19,20] (for a review see [11]).…”
Section: Problem Description and Assessment Of A Finite-difference Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual procedure is to start from an initial guess of the charge density and electric potential fields, ρ and V , and to iterate the numerical solution of the reduced Maxwell equations, adjusting at each iteration the value of V (as, e.g., in Refs. [6][7][8]) or ρ (as, e.g., in Refs. [9][10][11]) at the wire, until convergence is achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%