2007
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.093468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mathematical Model of Glioblastoma Tumor Spheroid Invasion in a Three-Dimensional In Vitro Experiment

Abstract: Glioblastoma, the most malignant form of brain cancer, is responsible for 23% of primary brain tumors and has extremely poor outcome. Confounding the clinical management of glioblastomas is the extreme local invasiveness of these cancer cells. The mechanisms that govern invasion are poorly understood. To gain insight into glioblastoma invasion, we conducted experiments on the patterns of growth and dispersion of U87 glioblastoma tumor spheroids in a three-dimensional collagen gel. We studied two different cell… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
221
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
15
221
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the adhesion strength between leading-edge cells and followers is weakened, the leading cells can migrate individually (data not shown), as is typically observed in glioma cell invasion in vitro (Kim et al 2009;Stein et al 2007). How this is controlled in different cell types is not understood.…”
Section: The Cell-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…When the adhesion strength between leading-edge cells and followers is weakened, the leading cells can migrate individually (data not shown), as is typically observed in glioma cell invasion in vitro (Kim et al 2009;Stein et al 2007). How this is controlled in different cell types is not understood.…”
Section: The Cell-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This has been generalised in numerous investigations, for example in off-lattice models (Lipkova et al, 2011), whereby the framework at the individual level does not rely upon a discretisation of space and/or time, as well as the incorporation of numerous physical and biological features. Examples in this popular field (Chowdhury et al, 2005;Othmer and Stevens, 1997;Hillen and Othmer, 2000;Deroulers et al, 2009) include the consideration of exclusion processes (Landman and Fernando, 2011), motility biases such as chemotaxis (Hillen and Painter, 2009), competing cell populations (Penington et al, 2011), contact interactions (Lushnikov et al, 2008;Painter and Sherratt, 2003) and cell-cell adhesions (Stein et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes them harder to adapt to specific patient cases. Macroscopic models on the other hand, describe the average behavior of tumor cells and model the evolution of local tumor cell densities rather than individual cells [39,8,18,9,16,45,10,13,26,37]. Therefore, it is harder for them to capture the stochastic characteristic of tumor growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the macroscopic models, [39,8,18,16,37], are based on the reactiondiffusion formalism Murray introduced in the early 1990 and later formulated as a conservation equation [27,40]. This formalism uses the general class of partial differential equations (PDEs) called the reaction-diffusion and reactiondiffusion-advection type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%