2003
DOI: 10.1080/713610175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mathematical Model of Phytoremediation for Petroleum Contaminated Soil: Sensitivity Analysis

Abstract: Phytoremediation is an attractive treatment technology for many contaminated sites due to its cost effectiveness and public acceptance. We present a sensitivity analysis of important parameters from a screening level model for phytoremediation by grass species of weathered petroleum-contaminated sites. The conceptual framework is that root movement through contaminated soil will enhance contaminant biodegradation by providing a local environment more favorable for petroleum degrading microorganisms--the so-cal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimated costs for hydraulic control of an unspecifi ed contaminant in a 20-foot-deep aquifer at a 1-acre site were $660,000 for conventional pump and treat and $250,000 for phytoremediation (EPA/600/R-99/107). Studies indicate that phytoremediation is competitive with other treatment alternatives, as costs are approximately 50-80 % of the costs associated with physical, chemical or thermal techniques at applicable sites (Thomas et al 2003 ). Some more actuarial studies need to be carried out to give an estimate of the perceived costs of remediation works that will be useful for project sanctioning authorities or decision-makers.…”
Section: Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimated costs for hydraulic control of an unspecifi ed contaminant in a 20-foot-deep aquifer at a 1-acre site were $660,000 for conventional pump and treat and $250,000 for phytoremediation (EPA/600/R-99/107). Studies indicate that phytoremediation is competitive with other treatment alternatives, as costs are approximately 50-80 % of the costs associated with physical, chemical or thermal techniques at applicable sites (Thomas et al 2003 ). Some more actuarial studies need to be carried out to give an estimate of the perceived costs of remediation works that will be useful for project sanctioning authorities or decision-makers.…”
Section: Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing effective models may help to address these limitations and might help the research community to understand the interactions among the many processes that contribute to phytoremediation. Thoma and colleagues [49,50] developed a model for screening grass species for the phytoremediation of weathered petroleum. Models for calculating hydraulic control based on transpiration and groundwater characteristics have been discussed and evaluated, with the suggestion that field measurements be used to verify model predictions whenever possible [51].…”
Section: Models Of Phytoremediationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus for a plant species to qualify for application in phytoremediation it has to posses characteristics such as strong adaptive features, resistance to adverse conditions, grow rapidly under normal conditions and probably have high germination rates. Although mathematical models have been developed to determine the appropriateness of a plant species (Thoma et al, 2003) for remediation of soil impacted by organics, the actual selection is empirical and based on laboratory or greenhouse trials (Kirkpatrick et al, 2006;Liste and Prutz, 2006;Euliss et al, 2007;Muratova et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%