2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mathematical model to predict nanomedicine pharmacokinetics and tumor delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A tumor-compartment bearing PB-PK model has recently been developed to investigate the effects of nanoparticle properties, tumour variables and individual physiological differences on the plasma circulation time, MPS sequestration, tumor delivery, and excretion of nanoparticles. This model provides important mechanistic information and evaluates the impact of both physiological and pathophysiological conditions that could affect tumour delivery and inform patient selection, however it does not address drug release 33 . Using non‐invasive in vivo imaging enables the visualization and quantification of the whole‐body disposition behavior of nanoparticles and other advanced therapeutics which is essential for a comprehensive understanding of their distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tumor-compartment bearing PB-PK model has recently been developed to investigate the effects of nanoparticle properties, tumour variables and individual physiological differences on the plasma circulation time, MPS sequestration, tumor delivery, and excretion of nanoparticles. This model provides important mechanistic information and evaluates the impact of both physiological and pathophysiological conditions that could affect tumour delivery and inform patient selection, however it does not address drug release 33 . Using non‐invasive in vivo imaging enables the visualization and quantification of the whole‐body disposition behavior of nanoparticles and other advanced therapeutics which is essential for a comprehensive understanding of their distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the SI, the more significance a parameter holds. A detailed description of the GSA workflow can be found in 38, 60, 61 . All analyses were performed in MATLAB R2018a.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biodistribution/physiological pharmacokinetics Li et al, 2010Li et al, , 2012Li and Reineke, 2011;Dogra et al, 2020a Transport in avascular tumors Gao et al, 2013;Curtis et al, 2016a Transport in irregularly vascularized tumors van de Ven et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2014;Curtis et al, 2016a;Miller and Frieboes, 2019a,b Transport based on nanoparticle physical characteristics Decuzzi and Ferrari, 2006;Decuzzi et al, 2009;Godin et al, 2010b Binding to tumor vasculature Frieboes et al, 2013;Curtis et al, 2015;Chamseddine et al, 2018Chamseddine et al, , 2020 Interactions with macrophages Leonard et al, , 2017Leonard et al, , 2020Mahlbacher et al, 2018 Intracellular pharmacokinetics Li et al, 2013;Miller and Frieboes, 2019b For tumor detection Reichel et al, 2015 For hyperthermia applications Kaddi et al, 2013 For drug delivery van de Ven et al, 2012;Li et al, 2013;Curtis et al, 2015Curtis et al, , 2016aLeonard et al, , 2017Leonard et al, , 2020Chamseddine et al, 2018Chamseddine et al, , 2020Miller and Frieboes, 2019a,b; FIGURE 4 | Effect of repeated therapy on simulated breast cancer liver metastsis lesions over 9 day, showing (A) drug (as% of maximum blood levels) and (B) tumor effect (as% of initial lesion diameter) after nAb-PTX and MSV-nAb-PTX injection. In all cases, therapy is initiated at 0, 3, and 6 day.…”
Section: Nanotherapy Focus Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%