2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2018.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mathematical model to predict thickness distribution and formability of incremental forming combined with stretch forming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum draw wall angle ranged between 84.80° and 85.01° for a variable wall angled geometry with major diameter of 177 mm and a minor diameter of 142 mm. In the cross-sectional analysis (Figure 6) are revealed major thickness variations from 2.54 mm in region 1, 0.5 mm in region 5 and 2.2 mm in region 11 [13].…”
Section: Recent Achievements In Sheet Metal Forming Researchmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum draw wall angle ranged between 84.80° and 85.01° for a variable wall angled geometry with major diameter of 177 mm and a minor diameter of 142 mm. In the cross-sectional analysis (Figure 6) are revealed major thickness variations from 2.54 mm in region 1, 0.5 mm in region 5 and 2.2 mm in region 11 [13].…”
Section: Recent Achievements In Sheet Metal Forming Researchmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Multi-stage toolpath strategy is continuously optimized by research community to achieve formability and complexity in component geometry. Multi-stage incremental forming is used for high wall angles but is a concern because of the high thickness variation and necessitates the employment of trial and error methods used by a knowledgeable engineer [13].…”
Section: Future Reasearch Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salem et al presented an algorithm to predict and calculate the actual thickness by using the plane normal vector of the distorted element across the sheet [ 15 ]. Choi and Lee presented a mathematical prediction model of thickness distribution of the hybrid forming of ISMF and stretch forming based on the conventional sine law [ 16 ]. However, these methods have a great disadvantage in that they have a large number of calculations for the thickness prediction of parts with varied forming angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] have attempted heat assisted SPIF since the temperature helps in improving the formability of the material. In order to improve the precision and formability in SPIF, researchers employed different strategies like heating the sheet metal during forming process [10] and stretching forming in conjunction with conventional SPIF [11]. It was observed by Vahdani et al [10] in their investigation that the maximum depth of formed component was not improved in hot SPIF eventhough there is an improvement in formability of the DC01steel material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%