2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A matter of focus: monoaminergic modulation of stimulus coding in mammalian sensory networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
176
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
4
176
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the current peri-LC BET and AMPA infusion parameters reliably increase tonic LC firing (Berridge and Foote, 1991) and disrupt PPI, whereas clonidine reduces tonic LC firing (Berridge et al, 1993) and normalizes BET-induced PPI deficits, the present results provide the first clear evidence for this hypothesis. LC-NE is also well known to regulate sensory signal processing, with enhanced NE transmission having the ability to improve signal-to-noise characteristics of sensory receptive fields in a number of modalities and sites Waterhouse, 2004, 2011;Escanilla et al, 2010;Hirata et al, 2006;Hurley et al, 2004;Moxon et al, 2007). LC-NE effects on sensory signal processing also seem to follow an inverted-U-shaped profile, raising the intriguing possibility that high levels of tonic LC-NE activation (as would be achieved with the pharmacological approaches of the present studies) might affect the processing of the prepulse in primary sensory pathways as that information is conveyed to the pontine nuclei that ultimately mediate PPI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the current peri-LC BET and AMPA infusion parameters reliably increase tonic LC firing (Berridge and Foote, 1991) and disrupt PPI, whereas clonidine reduces tonic LC firing (Berridge et al, 1993) and normalizes BET-induced PPI deficits, the present results provide the first clear evidence for this hypothesis. LC-NE is also well known to regulate sensory signal processing, with enhanced NE transmission having the ability to improve signal-to-noise characteristics of sensory receptive fields in a number of modalities and sites Waterhouse, 2004, 2011;Escanilla et al, 2010;Hirata et al, 2006;Hurley et al, 2004;Moxon et al, 2007). LC-NE effects on sensory signal processing also seem to follow an inverted-U-shaped profile, raising the intriguing possibility that high levels of tonic LC-NE activation (as would be achieved with the pharmacological approaches of the present studies) might affect the processing of the prepulse in primary sensory pathways as that information is conveyed to the pontine nuclei that ultimately mediate PPI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many of the cortical targets of reward signals-such as oculomotor neurons in frontal and parietal cortex-are ideally situated to send modulatory feedback signals to earlier sensory areas so that the cortical representation of high-value stimulus features can be enhanced (Bisley and Goldberg 2003;Ding and Hikosaka 2006;Gold and Shadlen 2007;Serences and Yantis 2006;Shadlen and Newsome 2001). In addition to DA neurons, the locus ceruleus sends long-range norepinephrine projections that have been implicated in modulating activity in sensory cortices in response to highly relevant stimuli (Aston-Jones and Cohen 2005;Berridge 2008;Berridge and Waterhouse 2003;Hurley et al 2004;Manunta and Edeline 2004;Sara 2009;Schultz and Dickinson 2000). Thus although both DA and norepinephrine pathways are viable candidates for the induction of value-related modulations in early visual cortex, future research will be required to more precisely characterize the source of these modulations, perhaps using pharmacological interventions in combination with fMRI (e.g., Pleger et al 2009;Silver et al 2008).…”
Section: Value and Population Responses In Human Visual Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These serotonergic neurons, found mostly within the dorsal and median raphe nuclei, have their highest levels of activity in awake and alert animals but are less active in sleeping or inattentive animals (Trulson and Jacobs, 1979;Heym et al, 1982;Trulson and Trulson, 1982;Waterhouse et al, 2004). There is corresponding evidence across multiple sensory systems that serotonin alters sensory circuitry in highly selective ways that promote the extraction of features of sensory stimuli (for review, see Hurley et al, 2004).…”
Section: Functional Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite this evidence, there has been little focus within the auditory system or other sensory systems on the specific ways that neuromodulators change latencies and whether these vary for different cell types or occur independently from neuromodulatory effects on response strength. In the experiments described here, we addressed these issues by applying serotonin iontophoretically while recording from single neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC), a nucleus in which the stimulus features that influence latency Fuzessery and Hall, 1996;Barsz et al, 1998;Klug et al, 2000;Galazyuk and Feng, 2001;Faure et al, 2003) and the modulation of response properties by serotonin Pollak, 1999, 2001;Hurley et al, 2002Hurley et al, , 2004 have been well studied. With this approach, we characterized serotonergic effects on latency by (1) quantifying serotonergic effects on the latency and precision of spikes, (2) comparing serotoninevoked changes in latency with changes in spike count and other response properties, and (3) determining the dependence of serotonin-evoked latency shifts on features of the stimulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%