2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A matter of size and shape: Microclimatic changes induced by experimental gap openings in a sessile oak–hornbeam forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the microclimatic variations of the small-scale gaps caused by treefall, the differences were less pronounced than for the comparison of different vegetation types and successional stages. The main reason for that could be the relatively small gap size, as gaps with a diameter up to one tree height can maintain forest conditions (Horváth et al 2023 ), and differences in forest structure (De Frenne et al 2021 ). Nevertheless, we found significant temperature differences between forest stand and gap for A. chilensis in the warmest month of the year (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the microclimatic variations of the small-scale gaps caused by treefall, the differences were less pronounced than for the comparison of different vegetation types and successional stages. The main reason for that could be the relatively small gap size, as gaps with a diameter up to one tree height can maintain forest conditions (Horváth et al 2023 ), and differences in forest structure (De Frenne et al 2021 ). Nevertheless, we found significant temperature differences between forest stand and gap for A. chilensis in the warmest month of the year (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were defined as the canopy gaps created by the fall or decay of one or several large trees in the forest crown layers under natural mortality or external disturbances that can generate localized succession within the forest gaps, namely, the theory of gap-phase regeneration. The theory became the basis for the research on forest dynamics [3,4]. As research continued, Runkle, an American forest ecologist, divided the concept of forest gaps into two parts after studying mature forests in eastern North America [5]: (1) canopy gap, the area or space of land directly under the canopy gap (i.e., forest gap in the narrow sense); (2) expanded gap, the area or space of land surrounded by the trunks of the trees surrounding the open space, includes the area or space enclosed by the canopy gap and the edge of the base of the trunks of the surrounding trees (i.e., forest gaps in the broad sense).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%