1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf01210926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mean field spin glass with short-range interactions

Abstract: Abstract. We formulate and study a spin glass model on the Bethe lattice. Appropriate boundary fields replace the traditional self-consistent methods; they give our model well-defined thermodynamic properties. We establish that there is a spin glass transition temperature above which the single-site magnetizations vanish, and below which the Edwards-Anderson order parameter is strictly positive. In a neighborhood below the transition temperature, we use bifurcation theory to establish the existence of a nontri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
84
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Can we go from one to the other smoothly, without passing through a phase transition? 28 You cannot mix oil and water, but you can mix oil and alcohol, and certainly can mix alcohol and water. Changing the concentrations smoothly starting from oil, going through pure alcohol, and ending at water demonstrates that these two fluids are part of the same phase (see Fig.…”
Section: Oil Alcohol Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Can we go from one to the other smoothly, without passing through a phase transition? 28 You cannot mix oil and water, but you can mix oil and alcohol, and certainly can mix alcohol and water. Changing the concentrations smoothly starting from oil, going through pure alcohol, and ending at water demonstrates that these two fluids are part of the same phase (see Fig.…”
Section: Oil Alcohol Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But we could have done an analogous calculation for a system with several gases of different masses; our momentum sphere would become an ellipsoid, but the momentum distribution is given by the same formula. More surprising, we shall see (using the canonical ensemble in Section 6.2) that interactions do not matter either, as long as the system is classical: 28 the probability densities for the momenta are still given by 28 Relativistic effects, magnetic fields, and quantum mechanics will change the velocity distribution. Equation 3.19 will be reasonably accurate for all gases at reasonable temperatures, all liquids but helium, and many solids that are not too cold.…”
Section: The Microcanonical Ideal Gas 43mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If one considers for instance the model with h = 0 on the finite tree T with i.i.d. Bernoulli random boundary data η with p = 1/2 at the leaves of T , then the distribution of the magnetization at the root (as a function of η) becomes non trivial only if β > β 1 , see [9]. In particular, as → ∞, for β β 1 the Gibbs measure on T with the above random boundary η, converges (weakly) a.s. to the free measure µ free .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…µ + = µ − as soon as β β 0 ). Then, in sharp contrast to the model on Z d , there is a second critical point b−1 which is often referred to as the "spin-glass critical point" [9] and has different interpretations. If one considers for instance the model with h = 0 on the finite tree T with i.i.d.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%