2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb5f9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Measurement of the Hubble Constant Using Gravitational Waves from the Binary Merger GW190814

Abstract: We present a test of the statistical method introduced by Bernard F. Shutz in 1986 using only gravitational waves to infer the Hubble constant (H0) from GW190814, the first high-probability neutron-star–black hole (NS–BH) merger candidate detected by the Laser Interferometer gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) and the Virgo interferometer. We apply a baseline test of this method to the binary neutron star (BNS) merger GW170817 and find … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution from an individual event is less informative than in the counterpart case, but combining information from multiple events reduces the uncertainty and allows an additional constraint on 0 to be made (see, e.g. MacLeod & Hogan (2008); Chen et al (2018); Fishbach et al (2019); Soares-Santos et al (2019); Gray et al (2020); Abbott et al (2020); Palmese et al (2020); Vasylyev & Filippenko (2020); Finke et al (2021). An alternative, cross-correlating GW events with galaxies of known redshift, is presented in Mukherjee et al (2021)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution from an individual event is less informative than in the counterpart case, but combining information from multiple events reduces the uncertainty and allows an additional constraint on 0 to be made (see, e.g. MacLeod & Hogan (2008); Chen et al (2018); Fishbach et al (2019); Soares-Santos et al (2019); Gray et al (2020); Abbott et al (2020); Palmese et al (2020); Vasylyev & Filippenko (2020); Finke et al (2021). An alternative, cross-correlating GW events with galaxies of known redshift, is presented in Mukherjee et al (2021)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On 17 August 2017 by the collaboration of advanced LIGO and Virgo detector, a strong GW signal was observed from the BNS merger. That signal allowed to use GW170817 as a standard siren and for finding Hubble constant and that was, H0 = 69.0 −8.0 +16.0 km s -1 Mpc -1 (Abbott et al, 2021 The Astrophysical Journal; Vasylyev et al, 2020) [40,41] . By Hubble constant, the mean expansion rate of the universe can measure.…”
Section: Hubble Constant (Hc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orange curve is the signal of GW170817 BNS from host galaxy NGC4993. For the signal GW170814 DES-Y1 galaxy catalogue used and for other remaining signals BBHs, GW170809, GW170104, GW170608, GW151226, GW150914 GLADE catalogue was used (Vasylyev et al, 2020) [41] . With the vertical dash line, 68% maximum a-posteriori intervals are represented.…”
Section: Hubble Constant (Hc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution from an individual event is less informative than in the counterpart case, but combining information from multiple events reduces the uncertainty and allows an additional constraint on 𝐻 0 to be made (see, e.g. MacLeod & Hogan (2008); Chen et al (2018); Fishbach et al (2019); Soares-Santos et al (2019); Gray et al (2020); Abbott et al (2020); Palmese et al (2020); Vasylyev & Filippenko (2020); Finke et al (2021)). One important aspect of this method is acknowledging that galaxy catalogues are incomplete, and therefore may not contain the real host galaxy of the GW event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%