2016
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201611673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mechanism for acetylcholine receptor gating based on structure, coupling, phi, and flip

Abstract: Gupta et al. use single-channel electrophysiology to investigate the gating mechanism of acetylcholine receptor ion channels. They propose that channel opening starts at the M2–M3 linker and ligand-binding sites and proceeds through four brief intermediate conformations before ending with the collapse of a gate bubble.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
84
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
10
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of whether a new proton sensor is created or proton sensitivity of an existing site is altered, the biphasic proton dose response curves stem from mismatched interactions between the GLIC ECD and GABAρ TMD. These data provide support for the idea that agonist-mediated pLGIC gating transitions are regulated by specific interdomain interactions between the ECD and TMD (Bertozzi et al, 2016; Gupta et al, 2017; Lee and Sine, 2005; Xiu et al, 2005). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regardless of whether a new proton sensor is created or proton sensitivity of an existing site is altered, the biphasic proton dose response curves stem from mismatched interactions between the GLIC ECD and GABAρ TMD. These data provide support for the idea that agonist-mediated pLGIC gating transitions are regulated by specific interdomain interactions between the ECD and TMD (Bertozzi et al, 2016; Gupta et al, 2017; Lee and Sine, 2005; Xiu et al, 2005). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…At the ECD-TMD interface, connections between flexible loops in the extracellular binding domain (loops 2, 7, 9) with the transmembrane channel domain (M2–M3 loop) structurally link the two domains and are essential for coupling ligand binding to channel gating (Miller and Smart, 2010). Agonist-mediated closed to open channel gating transitions are accompanied by substantial rearrangements of this interface (Bertozzi et al, 2016; Dellisanti et al, 2013; Gupta et al, 2017; Lee and Sine, 2005; Velisetty et al, 2014; Xiu et al, 2005). In chimeric channels assembled by combining the ECD and TMD of two distinct pLGICs, substantial loop substitutions are required to maintain complementarity and ensure normal channel function (Bouzat et al, 2008; Bouzat et al, 2004; Eisele et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As illustrated in Figure a, the interface between the ECD and TMD comprises a linker between the ECD β10 strand and the M1 α‐helix of the TMD, as well as three loops named β1–β2 linker, M2–M3 linker, and the Cys‐loop. A strong energy coupling was observed between the central part of the M2–M3 linker and the β1–β2 linker (P271; Gupta, Chakraborty, Vij, & Auerbach, ), and we used the distance between the central residues of these linkers, which we call the “activation distance,” to characterise different activation states (Table S2). The experimental structures of the glycine receptor, GLIC, and GluCl captured in various activation states provide evidence that the closed/resting state displays an activation distance that is longer than that of the open or desensitised states (6–8 Å compared to 4–5 Å).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of characters, or morphological features, that a particular biological structure exhibits is related to its function, as broadly exemplified across the gamut of morphology -from the biomechanics of jaws [Nishikawa and Gans, 1996] to amino acid components of nicotinic acetylcholinergic receptors [Gupta et al, 2017] to the cytoarchitecture of visual cortex [Hubel and Wiesel, 1968]. However, such observations need to be tempered with the recognition that particular functions may involve different hierarchical levels of structure, such as whether the electrical activity in a muscle is based on the neural innervation of the muscle or the membrane properties and sodium channels of the cells involved [Lauder, 1994].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%