2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

154
3,329
4
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,788 publications
(3,501 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
154
3,329
4
14
Order By: Relevance
“…6). The 'communication through coherence' hypothesis (Fries, 2005(Fries, , 2009 suggests that selective communication is achieved through coherence between firing rate oscillation in the sending region and oscillatory gain modulation in the receiving region, which allows a network to respond selectively to task-relevant target signals while ignoring irrelevant inputs. Computational modeling demonstrates that selective communication can indeed be achieved by coherent oscillatory gain modulation, but that the structure of oscillatory activity must satisfy certain constraints (Akam and Kullmann, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6). The 'communication through coherence' hypothesis (Fries, 2005(Fries, , 2009 suggests that selective communication is achieved through coherence between firing rate oscillation in the sending region and oscillatory gain modulation in the receiving region, which allows a network to respond selectively to task-relevant target signals while ignoring irrelevant inputs. Computational modeling demonstrates that selective communication can indeed be achieved by coherent oscillatory gain modulation, but that the structure of oscillatory activity must satisfy certain constraints (Akam and Kullmann, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction Synchronous brain rhythms represent a dynamic mechanism for coordinating neural activity across large-scale neuronal networks and controlling the timing of neuronal firing (Engel et al, 2001;Buzsaki and Draguhn, 2004;Wang, 2010). Evidence from the past two decades of research suggests that neural oscillations subserve important cognitive functions, including motor control (Fries, 2005;Schnitzler and Gross, 2005;Fetz, 2013). During sustained contractions, primary motor cortex shows oscillations in alpha (8 12 Hz) and beta (15 30 Hz) bands (Murthy and Fetz, 1992;Sanes and Donoghue, 1993;Baker et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortical gamma-band activity in general has been found to be involved in many cortical processes (Tallon-Baudry, 2009;Fries, 2009), and might serve as a mechanism for efficient neuronal communication and processing (Fries, 2005). Gamma activity has been related to important brain functions such as visual (Hoogenboom et al, 2006) and tactile processing (Bauer et al, 2006), memory (Jensen et al, 2007;van der Werf et al, 2008), attention (Fries et al, 2001), and motor control (Schoffelen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Eccentricity Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation calls for a neuronal mechanism, often referred to as binding (Treisman, 1999;Treisman and Gelade, 1980;Zimmer et al, 2006), allowing for integration of distributed information in the service of cognitive functions (e.g., Ballard et al, 1983;Barlow, 1972;Von der Malsburg, 1981). Several authors suggested that such a mechanism could be implemented in the brain via temporally synchronized firing patterns of neuronal assemblies (Engel et al, 1992;Fries, 2005;Jensen, 2006;Lisman, 2005;Singer and Gray, 1995;Singer et al, 1996). Although not undisputed (e.g., Palanca and DeAngelis, 2005;Shadlen and Movshon, 1999), the binding theory has received support from studies of intracranial recordings that revealed that groups of activated neurons tend to synchronize in the gamma-frequency band (30-100 Hz).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the exact roles of gamma oscillations in cognitive functioning (cf. Herrmann et al, 2004;Singer and Gray, 1995;Tallon-Baudry and Bertrand, 1999, for reviews), it becomes obvious that synchronized oscillatory activity can be considered an effective and flexible communication structure on top of the less plastic anatomical structure (Fries, 2005). However, not much is known about how lifespan changes in neuroanatomy and neurochemistry during maturation, learning, and senescence affect local synchronization properties as evidenced by EEG gamma-band oscillations (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%