2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4922434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mechanism of wave drag reduction in the thermal energy deposition experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where X i and Y i are the front coordinates and the angles γ i and φ i correspond to the same interaction point i. For the same "sphere-to-sphere" geometry considered in [22], the equations can be set for an interaction time t = nR b /V 1 , 0 < n < 2, scaled with a characteristic time τ =…”
Section: The Model Of Vortex Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where X i and Y i are the front coordinates and the angles γ i and φ i correspond to the same interaction point i. For the same "sphere-to-sphere" geometry considered in [22], the equations can be set for an interaction time t = nR b /V 1 , 0 < n < 2, scaled with a characteristic time τ =…”
Section: The Model Of Vortex Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The media on both sides of the interface are considered as ideal gases with initially equal pressures across the interface. At the second stage of the interaction, when the refracted shock wave starts to propagate off the interface through the plasma volume, the effect is dependent on the density distribution in the cloud [15,22,35] and will be considered separately for each type of the distribution. Even though the changes in the shock front shape start to appear during this period of time, they are still the consequences of the interaction at both stages, on the interface and in volume.…”
Section: The Model Of Vortex Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since the shock and the flow instabilities take place upstream from the interface, the perturbations to the flow parameters propagating downstream, toward the interface, will disturb it. The overall pressure drop behind the perturbed (refracted) shock as a result of the flow parameter re-distribution [9] continuously mounting with time will be responsible for the sucking effect resulting in the large-scale interface perturbation moving it closer to the shock. The positive and essentially non-linear dynamics in the pressure perturbation evolution [9] will support amplification of this global perturbation to the interface.…”
Section: The Interface Stability Problem and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%