“…Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a member of the ERBB receptor tyrosine kinase family, plays an indispensable role in cellular signaling related to cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, migration, adhesion, and survival. − Dysregulation and overactivity of EGFR have been implicated in various human cancers, including lung, breast, gastric, head, and neck cancers. − Activating mutations in the EGFR kinase domain, primarily the L858R point mutation and exon 19 deletions, give rise to non-small-cell lung cancer. , Patients carrying one of these activating mutations benefit enormously from treatment with the first-generation reversible and 4-amino-quinazoline-based EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib ( 1 , Figure ) and erlotinib ( 2 , Figure ) that elicit excellent clinical response rates of 50–80% as compared to traditional chemotherapy. − However, patients eventually develop an additional specific point mutation (T790M) at the gatekeeper position of EGFR that limits the therapeutic efficacy of the first-generation EGFR TKIs. ,− Replacement of a threonine residue with a larger methionine provokes steric repulsion in the drug-binding site, resulting in an altered conformation of the catalytic domain that accounts for the dramatic reduction in inhibitory activity. ,, In addition, as compared to the L858R point mutation that causes a substantial loss of ATP affinity to EGFR, the T790M mutants restore the ATP affinity to almost the same level as in wild-type EGFR (EGFR WT ), resulting in reduced cellular potency for ATP-competitive inhibitors in the presence of cellular ATP concentrations. , To overcome the resistance caused by T790M mutation, second-generation irreversible EGFR TKIs dacomitinib ( 3 , Figure ), afatinib ( 4 , Figure ), canertinib, and CI-1033 ( 5 , Figure ) were developed. These have an electrophilic warhead that covalently targets a unique cysteine (Cys797) located at the lip of the ATP binding site in EGFR. , Although these covalent inhibitors have improved clinical performance relative to their reversible counterparts, their efficacy in patients is restricted due to dose-limiting toxic side effects that are correlated with inhibition of EGFR WT . ,…”