2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/829/2/86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Megacam Survey of Outer Halo Satellites. Vi. The Spatially Resolved Star-Formation History of the Carina Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxy*

Abstract: We present the spatially resolved star-formation history (SFH) of the Carina dwarf spheroidal galaxy, obtained from deep, wide-field g andr imaging and a metallicity distribution from the literature. Our photometry covers ∼2 deg 2 , reaching up to ∼10 times the half-light radius of Carina with a completeness higher than 50% at g∼24.5, more than one magnitude fainter than the oldest turnoff. This is the first time a combination of depth and coverage of this quality has been used to derive the SFH of Carina, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(139 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect can eventually lead to an overall median age gradient where young stars form in the center of the galaxy and old stars are preferentially found in the outskirts. Qualitatively, this agrees with the observed age and metallicity gradients seen in most dwarf galaxies locally, where younger (more metal-rich) stars lie in the center and older (more metal-poor) stars in the outskirts (Battaglia et al 2006;Faria et al 2007;Beccari et al 2014;McMonigal et al 2014;del Pino et al 2015;Santana et al 2016;Kacharov et al 2017;McQuinn et al 2017;Okamoto et al 2017;Cicuéndez et al 2018;Cicuéndez & Battaglia 2018).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…This effect can eventually lead to an overall median age gradient where young stars form in the center of the galaxy and old stars are preferentially found in the outskirts. Qualitatively, this agrees with the observed age and metallicity gradients seen in most dwarf galaxies locally, where younger (more metal-rich) stars lie in the center and older (more metal-poor) stars in the outskirts (Battaglia et al 2006;Faria et al 2007;Beccari et al 2014;McMonigal et al 2014;del Pino et al 2015;Santana et al 2016;Kacharov et al 2017;McQuinn et al 2017;Okamoto et al 2017;Cicuéndez et al 2018;Cicuéndez & Battaglia 2018).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Jablonka et al 2015) Conversely, there are hints that lower mass classical dSphs, such as Sextans and Carina, could have a larger dispersion at fixed metallicity. In the case of Carina this is expected because of its star formation history, characterized by at least three distinct bursts (Hurley-Keller et al 1998;Santana et al 2016) that are so far interpreted as resulting from interactions with the Milky Way (Fabrizio et al 2011(Fabrizio et al , 2016Pasetto et al 2011). In Sextans, the observed dispersion in [α/Fe], when data from Aoki et al (2009) and Tafelmeyer et al (2010) are considered, has been attributed to the effect of the smaller number of supernovae enriching the ISM from which the observed stars were born, and to the coexistence of pockets of ISM with various abundances.…”
Section: The α Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Clarkson et al (2011), the bulge field BSS frequency (S BSS ), defined as the number of BSS scaled to the number of RC stars, is between 0.3 and 1.23, while for the clusters Ferraro et al (2003) found 0.1 S BSS 1. However, based on a photometric study of a sample of globular clusters and dwarf spheroidals, Santana et al (2013Santana et al ( , 2016 found that the number of BSS grows almost linearly with the total stellar mass of the system; therefore, the BSS frequency in dwarf spheroidals is much higher than in clusters. In addition, when considering that the dynamical state of the bulge is expected to be more similar to that of dwarf spheroidals than of clusters, it is plausible that the bulge BSS frequency provided by Clarkson et al (2011) could be an underestimation.…”
Section: Stellar Ages Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%