Advances in Soft Computing
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70706-6_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Memetic Algorithm for Water Distribution Network Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maier et al (2003) applied the ant colony optimisation approach and outperformed GAs both in terms of computational efficiency and their ability to find near global optimal solutions. Ban˜os et al (2007) analysed the performance of memetic algorithms for optimal design of looped water distribution systems and demonstrated that they work better for problems of larger size. Mohan and Jinesh (2009) proposed to use a heuristics based approach called heuristics based algorithm (HBA) to identify the least cost combination of pipe diameters.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maier et al (2003) applied the ant colony optimisation approach and outperformed GAs both in terms of computational efficiency and their ability to find near global optimal solutions. Ban˜os et al (2007) analysed the performance of memetic algorithms for optimal design of looped water distribution systems and demonstrated that they work better for problems of larger size. Mohan and Jinesh (2009) proposed to use a heuristics based approach called heuristics based algorithm (HBA) to identify the least cost combination of pipe diameters.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D ij is the hydrodynamic dispersion tensor computed on the basis of and of the specific discharge and is given by equation 14: (14) …in which α L is longitudinal dispersivity, ar is transverse dispersivity, is the magnitude of the specific discharge, and δ ij is the Kronecker delta δ ij = 1 if i = j and 0 otherwise). As mentioned earlier, this model is equivalent to the mobile-immobile physical partitioning model at equations (15)(16)(17): (15) with (16) …if we relate the parameters of these two models as: (17) …in which θ m and θ im are the mobile and immobile phases water contents; C m and C im are the mobile and immobile zone solute concentrations; f * is the fraction of solid matrix in contact with the mobile zone; k is the distribution coefficient; α r is first-order rate constant; and R im (= 1 + p b (1 -f * )k/ θ im )is the retardation factor solute corresponding to the immobile zone. The similarity between the two models is made to compare the results of the numerical model with those obtained from an analytical solution of the three-dimensional mobileimmobile partitioning model.…”
Section: Water Quality Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designs are evaluated in terms of cost and resilience (defined as the design's capability to overcome sudden failures). Their experiments show the merits of the differential evolution algorithm when compared to similar approaches, such as (Baños, Gil, Agulleiro, & Reca, 2007) and (Lippai, Heaney, & Laguna, 1999).…”
Section: Figure 1 Schematic Representation Of the Black-box Optimizamentioning
confidence: 99%