2014
DOI: 10.1037/neu0000121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis and meta-regression of serial reaction time task performance in Parkinson’s disease.

Abstract: The meta-analysis provides clear support that learning in procedural memory (procedural learning), which underlies implicit sequence learning in the SRT task, is impaired in PD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
59
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
3
59
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When controlling for medication effects, studies reveal deficits in learning from trial-by-trial feedback [46], a hallmark of implicit learning [47]. Indeed, a meta-analysis found Parkinson's disease patients to be significantly impaired in implicit learning across 27 studies using the serial reaction time task [48]. While implicit learning is thought to depend on the basal ganglia, explicit, declarative learning relies on the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe [49].…”
Section: Learning Deficits In Parkinson's Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When controlling for medication effects, studies reveal deficits in learning from trial-by-trial feedback [46], a hallmark of implicit learning [47]. Indeed, a meta-analysis found Parkinson's disease patients to be significantly impaired in implicit learning across 27 studies using the serial reaction time task [48]. While implicit learning is thought to depend on the basal ganglia, explicit, declarative learning relies on the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe [49].…”
Section: Learning Deficits In Parkinson's Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An [ 11 C] raclopride PET study showed striatal (accumbens) D2 release accompanied learning from discrete feedback in a probabilistic classification task [53 && ]. Further, learning from delayed feedback activates the hippocampus, whereas learning from immediate feedback engages the striatum [48]. A study investigated competing learning mechanisms in Parkinson's disease, with two initial tasks that tested novel tool features (explicit) and novel tool skill (implicit), and a follow-up task that assessed both learning acquisitions 3 weeks later.…”
Section: Learning Deficits In Parkinson's Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical PRL task involves participants first learning a stimulus-reward pairing (Phase 1), and later shifting to learn an opposite stimulus-reward pairing (Phase 2). Among individuals with PD, non-medicated participants performed better on PRL than spatial working memory tasks, suggesting PRL is relatively preserved in early PD [1]. By contrast, among individuals with PD treated with DA replacement therapy, learning the PRL task reward contingencies had reversed was impaired but task-set switching on a separate task was enhanced [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These two tasks have been linked to specific DA sensitive frontalsubcortical circuits. Specifically, spatial working memory, including procedural sequence learning, has been associated with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dorsal-striatum-DLPFC circuit, DS-DLPFC) [1,4], whereas probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) has been associated with ventral striatal-orbitofrontal areas (VS-OFC) [4,5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation