2016
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta‐analysis comparing clinical effects of short‐ or long‐acting GLP‐1 receptor agonists versus insulin treatment from head‐to‐head studies in type 2 diabetic patients

Abstract: Slightly better glycaemic control can be achieved by adding GLP-1 RAs to OGLM as compared to insulin treatment, with added benefits regarding bodyweight, hypoglycaemia, blood pressure and lipoproteins. These differences are in contrast to the fact that insulin is prescribed far more often than GLP-1 RAs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
81
1
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(147 reference statements)
3
81
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…8,9 Glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have showed reduction of both fasting and postprandial glucose levels because of their multifaceted mechanism of action, primarily, glucosedependent insulin secretion and glucagon suppression, delaying of gastric emptying and appetite suppression. 11 Short-acting GLP-1 RAs are believed to be more prandialspecific because of the lack of overnight receptor interactions to control fasting glucose levels, while long-acting GLP-1 RAs have been considered more basal-specific because of tachyphylaxis of their effect on delaying gastric emptying. A recent meta-analysis comparing short-and long-acting GLP-1 RAs showed overall greater reductions in HbA1c with long-acting agents compared with short-acting agents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have showed reduction of both fasting and postprandial glucose levels because of their multifaceted mechanism of action, primarily, glucosedependent insulin secretion and glucagon suppression, delaying of gastric emptying and appetite suppression. 11 Short-acting GLP-1 RAs are believed to be more prandialspecific because of the lack of overnight receptor interactions to control fasting glucose levels, while long-acting GLP-1 RAs have been considered more basal-specific because of tachyphylaxis of their effect on delaying gastric emptying. A recent meta-analysis comparing short-and long-acting GLP-1 RAs showed overall greater reductions in HbA1c with long-acting agents compared with short-acting agents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В другом метаанализе АР ГПП-1 (включая лираглутид) были ассоциированы с более низкой частотой тошноты и рвоты, но с более высокой частотой диареи, чем АР ГПП-1 короткого действия [45]. Еще в одном метаанализе было показано, что снижение массы тела по сравнению с инсулинотерапией при применении АР ГПП-1 длитель-ного действия (включая лираглутид) обычно меньше, чем при применении АР ГПП-1 короткого действия [46]. Это может быть обусловлено уменьшением степени за-медления скорости опорожнения желудка при примене-нии агонистов длительного действия из-за тахифилаксии рецептора ГПП-1 с длительной активацией [12].…”
Section: сравнение ар гпп-1unclassified
“…According to their mode of action, GLP-1RAs can be classified into short-acting preparations with once (lixisenatide) or twice (eventide) daily administration and long-acting with once daily (liraglutide) or once weekly (QW) administration (eventide QW, dulaglutide, albiglutide and semaglutide) (5). While long-acting GLP-1RAs have a stronger effect on fasting plasma glucose and overall glycemic control, short-acting preparations decrease more post-prandial blood-glucose (3,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While long-acting GLP-1RAs have a stronger effect on fasting plasma glucose and overall glycemic control, short-acting preparations decrease more post-prandial blood-glucose (3,5). In addition, once-weekly GLP-1RAs may improve patient compliance and quality of life compared to the short-action preparations (6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation