2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-020-0898-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis of country-level studies on environmental change and migration

Abstract: The impact of climate change on migration has gained both academic and public interest in recent years. Here we employ a meta-analysis approach to synthesize the evidence from 30 country-level studies which estimate the effect of slow and rapid-onset events on migration worldwide. Most studies find that environmental hazards affect migration, although with contextual variation. Migration is primarily internal or to low-and middle-income countries. The strongest relationship is found in studies with a large sha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
192
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
17
192
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantifying the number of people who migrate at least partly due to climate- and weather-related events is inherently challenging, due to conceptual ambiguity, lack of robust methodologies, and poor data 5 , 9 . In general, there is more evidence that climatic conditions influence short-distance temporary displacement than international migration 8 , 10 . However, several recent studies have linked adverse climatic conditions in sending countries to refugee and asylum migration, for which statistics are more complete 11 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantifying the number of people who migrate at least partly due to climate- and weather-related events is inherently challenging, due to conceptual ambiguity, lack of robust methodologies, and poor data 5 , 9 . In general, there is more evidence that climatic conditions influence short-distance temporary displacement than international migration 8 , 10 . However, several recent studies have linked adverse climatic conditions in sending countries to refugee and asylum migration, for which statistics are more complete 11 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complex interactions between climate risk, community risk aversion, and financial restrictions can serve as further explanatory factors for divergent migration patterns in the face of climate risk [12], particularly when there are multiple adaptation options with different risk-reward profiles. On the other hand, the robust effects of risk aversion and financial limitations on reducing community migration and average income suggest a role for risk transfer policies and interventions such as cash transfers that help households overcome financial restrictions.…”
Section: Risk Aversion and Financial Restrictions Mediate Climate Adamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change is likely to impact the livelihoods of many of the world's 500 million smallholder farming households [1,2], particularly with projected increases in drylands populations [3]. Migration represents one of several adaptation strategies that farmers could deploy in the face of climate stress [4], and there is mixed evidence on the extent to which climate change may positively or negatively impact migration flows [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. While some studies warn that climate impacts could displace over 100 million people worldwide [13,14], scholarship from more traditional migration disciplines emphasizes that climate change may constrain various forms of resources needed to migrate, including financial and social resources [8,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been a popular tool for synthesizing evidence in many fields, including evidence-based medicine, public health, and environmental research [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Through systematic reviews and meta-analyses, researchers can combine findings from independent studies on common research topics, with one goal being to produce overall results that may be more precise than individual studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%