2018
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1440579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis of effectiveness of E-interventions to reduce alcohol consumption in college and university students.

Abstract: E-Interventions show a small, significant effect at reducing mean alcoholic DPW. Personalised feedback E-Interventions showed the strongest effect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…HED has been associated with deleterious effects including increased risk of injury and involvement in the incidence of interpersonal violence and social disorder, and poor academic outcomes (NHMRC, 2009;WHO, 2018). The over-representation of university students engaging in HED and the consistently small effects of interventions aimed at curbing student HED (Prosser, Gee, & Jones, 2018) emphasizes the need to identify the determinants and associated mechanisms driving this behaviour in this population. The over-representation of university students engaging in HED and the consistently small effects of interventions aimed at curbing student HED (Prosser, Gee, & Jones, 2018) emphasizes the need to identify the determinants and associated mechanisms driving this behaviour in this population.…”
Section: Statement Of Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HED has been associated with deleterious effects including increased risk of injury and involvement in the incidence of interpersonal violence and social disorder, and poor academic outcomes (NHMRC, 2009;WHO, 2018). The over-representation of university students engaging in HED and the consistently small effects of interventions aimed at curbing student HED (Prosser, Gee, & Jones, 2018) emphasizes the need to identify the determinants and associated mechanisms driving this behaviour in this population. The over-representation of university students engaging in HED and the consistently small effects of interventions aimed at curbing student HED (Prosser, Gee, & Jones, 2018) emphasizes the need to identify the determinants and associated mechanisms driving this behaviour in this population.…”
Section: Statement Of Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definitions of HED vary by country and organization, but according to the WHO (2018) it is defined as consuming more than six 'standard' drinks (any alcoholic beverage containing 10 g of alcohol) in one session, at least monthly (WHO, 2018). The over-representation of university students engaging in HED and the consistently small effects of interventions aimed at curbing student HED (Prosser, Gee, & Jones, 2018) emphasizes the need to identify the determinants and associated mechanisms driving this behaviour in this population. Recent research has applied social cognition theories to identify the psychological correlates of risky alcohol consumption behaviours, including HED, and the processes involved (Caudwell, Keech, Hamilton, Mullan, & Hagger, 2019).…”
Section: Statement Of Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another perspective to take on songwriting interventions, is to examine existing support services within university environments. More often than not these services are often overstretched, and so there is a tendency within institutions to look toward technology or “E-solutions” for health and wellbeing difficulties in this population (Prosser et al, 2018). In contrast, however, this project suggests that there is clear and special value in face-to-face, relational, group work with this particularly vulnerable population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Groups appear to be a cost‐effective alternative to individual format in delivering PNF interventions on college campuses. Recent research is increasingly focused on electronic delivery methods (e.g., Cadigan et al, 2018; Dotson et al, 2015; Prosser et al, 2018) and thus has overlooked the potential therapeutic benefits of using groups to provide PNF interventions. In the extant literature, there is little depiction of PNF interventions in a group format with novel components, except for one published (Alfonso et al, 2013) and a few unpublished (e.g., Henry et al, 2004; Wilson et al, 2005) studies.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research on PNF interventions has mainly focused on the delivery methods. PNF interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in addressing risky drinking through web‐based (Prosser et al, 2018), text‐messaging (Cadigan et al, 2018), mailing (Larimer et al, 2007), computerized (Dotson et al, 2015), and face‐to‐face (Borsari & Carey, 2005) delivery. Although contemporary methods include only the stand‐alone PNF component, conventional face‐to‐face methods such as individual or group interventions typically combine PNF with MI, alcohol education, and protective behavioral strategies (PBS; Martens et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%