1991
DOI: 10.1097/00006199-199111000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Heparin Flush and Saline Flush

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
73
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies investigating peripheral intravenous catheters have shown no difference in catheter maintenance with the use of heparin versus saline, although there are no studies to confirm these findings in children. [46][47][48] Controversy continues regarding optimal practices for CVC care. Some benefits associated with heparin prophylaxis include presumed improved CVC patency and decreased need for replacement catheters, although various risks have been demonstrated as well, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, and bleeding as a result of errors in medication administration.…”
Section: Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies investigating peripheral intravenous catheters have shown no difference in catheter maintenance with the use of heparin versus saline, although there are no studies to confirm these findings in children. [46][47][48] Controversy continues regarding optimal practices for CVC care. Some benefits associated with heparin prophylaxis include presumed improved CVC patency and decreased need for replacement catheters, although various risks have been demonstrated as well, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, anaphylaxis, and bleeding as a result of errors in medication administration.…”
Section: Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prosedyren med skylling av perifere venekatetre med heparin er nå endret ved vårt sykehus. Skylling med saltvann har vist seg å vaere like bra som skylling med heparin (21), samtidig som man unngår de alvorlige heparininduserte bivirkningene. De fleste andre sykehus i landet bruker kun saltvann til skylling av perifere venekatetre.…”
Section: Noe å Laere Avunclassified
“…12 Potentially, institutions might achieve a cost savings if heparincontaining solutions are not required for flushing. In a meta-analysis published in 1991, Goode et al 14 found that eliminating heparin flushes in patients with peripheral intravenous catheters could yield a potential yearly savings of $109 million to $218 million. At Barnes Jewish Hospital, the cost of a premade 10-mL solution with 10 units of heparin per milliliter is 45 cents each; in contrast, the cost of a premade 10-mL solution of physiological saline is 26 cents.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%