2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis of mental imagery effects on post-injury functional mobility, perceived pain, and self-efficacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking also to sports psychology, the field from which vision interventions originated decades ago and which inspired research into vision in L2 motivation (Adolphs et al., ; Dörnyei et al., ), similarly raises questions about the centrality of vision in motivation and performance. In a recent meta‐analysis of the effects of mental imagery and vision interventions on biopsychological outcomes related to both performance restoration and performance optimization, Zach, Dobersek, Filho, Inglis, and Tenenbaum () reported that the effects of imagery interventions were all statistically nonsignificant. These researchers therefore argued that “much caution” (p. 85) is needed before making claims about the effectiveness of mental imagery.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking also to sports psychology, the field from which vision interventions originated decades ago and which inspired research into vision in L2 motivation (Adolphs et al., ; Dörnyei et al., ), similarly raises questions about the centrality of vision in motivation and performance. In a recent meta‐analysis of the effects of mental imagery and vision interventions on biopsychological outcomes related to both performance restoration and performance optimization, Zach, Dobersek, Filho, Inglis, and Tenenbaum () reported that the effects of imagery interventions were all statistically nonsignificant. These researchers therefore argued that “much caution” (p. 85) is needed before making claims about the effectiveness of mental imagery.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an art of visualising oneself behaving effectively or successfully in a given situation through mental imagery process (Maddux, 2005). This source is instrumental in guiding sport athletes’ confidence through performance restoration (or rehabilitation) and performance optimisation (Zach et al , 2018).…”
Section: Literature On Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor imagery (MI)-i.e., the mental representation of a physical action without overt body movement [11]-is effective in improving motor performance [12,13]. MI exerts beneficial effects on strength [13] and flexibility [14] in healthy adults; it reduces pain [15,16]; and it contributes to the rehabilitation of Parkinson's disease and stroke patients [17,18], though its effects on musculoskeletal patients are equivocal [19]. A recent metaanalysis showed that, when added to routine physical therapy (RPT) in post-injury rehabilitation, MI does not elicit greater benefits on functional mobility, perceived pain, and self-efficiency than RPT alone [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MI exerts beneficial effects on strength [ 13 ] and flexibility [ 14 ] in healthy adults; it reduces pain [ 15 , 16 ]; and it contributes to the rehabilitation of Parkinson’s disease and stroke patients [ 17 , 18 ], though its effects on musculoskeletal patients are equivocal [ 19 ]. A recent meta-analysis showed that, when added to routine physical therapy (RPT) in post-injury rehabilitation, MI does not elicit greater benefits on functional mobility, perceived pain, and self-efficiency than RPT alone [ 19 ]. However, in older patients following end-stage OA, combining MI with RPT produces positive effects on motor performance following total hip arthroplasty [ 20 ] and TKA [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%