2014
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu066.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-Analysis of Oestrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Discordance Between Primary Breast Cancer and Metastases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
51
2
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
51
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, correct tissue handling and fixation is crucial and the current recommendations for clinical testing should be met , however, analytical errors cannot account for all of the discordances. Aurilio et al performed a meta‐analysis of 48 articles evaluating ER, PR, and HER2 receptor discordance between primary breast cancer and metastases . The meta‐analysis included 4200 patients evaluating ER status and found pooled proportions of tumors shifting from positive to negative and negative to positive ER status of 24% and 14%, respectively.…”
Section: Endocrine Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, correct tissue handling and fixation is crucial and the current recommendations for clinical testing should be met , however, analytical errors cannot account for all of the discordances. Aurilio et al performed a meta‐analysis of 48 articles evaluating ER, PR, and HER2 receptor discordance between primary breast cancer and metastases . The meta‐analysis included 4200 patients evaluating ER status and found pooled proportions of tumors shifting from positive to negative and negative to positive ER status of 24% and 14%, respectively.…”
Section: Endocrine Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meta-analysis by Aurilio et al showed that the rates of discordance of primary tumor and metastasis for ER and PgR were 20 and 33% [13]. They also noted that the conversion to negative receptor status at recurrence was seen more frequently than the positive conversion with rates of 24% vs. 14% for ER status and 46% vs. 15% for PgR status [13], which can be greatly attributed to the treatment given that select subclones with different phenotypes to emerge. For the purpose of this article a molecular analyses of all three samples were done using TST 170 gene panel and no common mutation was found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis of 33 studies has reported rates of discordance between primary and metastatic sites of 20% for ER, 33% for PR and 8% for HER2. For ER, 24% of tumours converted from ER+ to ER-, while 14% gained ER positivity [114].…”
Section: Biological Challenges: Temporal Heterogeneity and Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-established occurrence of temporal heterogeneity [113,114] suggests that receptor expression status ought to be re-assessed prior to treatment selection in the metastatic setting [79]. A recent meta-analysis of 33 studies has reported rates of discordance between primary and metastatic sites of 20% for ER, 33% for PR and 8% for HER2.…”
Section: Biological Challenges: Temporal Heterogeneity and Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%