2014
DOI: 10.2172/1220537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-Analysis of Single-Family Deep Energy Retrofit Performance in the U.S.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An aggressive energy retrofit program is adopted, whereby 60% of the building stock is upgraded between 2015 and 2050 (1.7% annual retrofit rate, compared to 1.1% in the Annual Energy Outlook), in line with similar deep retrofit scenarios in other building energy projections (e.g., BLUE Map, 3CSEP) (63,64). Retrofitted homes reduce baseline heating load by 49% and cooling load by 25%, half of the optimal achievable savings from eliminating infiltration, improved insulation, and new windows according to US Department of Energy estimates (65), similar to observed savings in "deep" energy retrofits in the United States (66). Improving insulation and windows does not necessarily happen in tandem with upgrades to heating and/or cooling equipment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An aggressive energy retrofit program is adopted, whereby 60% of the building stock is upgraded between 2015 and 2050 (1.7% annual retrofit rate, compared to 1.1% in the Annual Energy Outlook), in line with similar deep retrofit scenarios in other building energy projections (e.g., BLUE Map, 3CSEP) (63,64). Retrofitted homes reduce baseline heating load by 49% and cooling load by 25%, half of the optimal achievable savings from eliminating infiltration, improved insulation, and new windows according to US Department of Energy estimates (65), similar to observed savings in "deep" energy retrofits in the United States (66). Improving insulation and windows does not necessarily happen in tandem with upgrades to heating and/or cooling equipment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Improving insulation and windows does not necessarily happen in tandem with upgrades to heating and/or cooling equipment. Performing deep energy retrofits in stages like this is less likely to meet owner resistance due to prolonged disruption, high upfront capital costs, and other challenges (66). Scenario 3: Grid Decarbonization with Aggressive Energy Retrofits.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability in existing homes makes the path to achieving a DER difficult, as different home configurations and existing components, combined with economic considerations may optimize different sets of packages in order to achieve efficiency goals (Walker & Less 2013). Furthermore, it has been noted that while typical DERs achieve greater airtightness improvements compared to conventional retrofits, ventilation systems are often not installed consistently, raising concerns for impacts on IAQ (Less & Walker 2014). Additionally, simulated versus actual performance after DER's has been questioned, particularly due to differences between simulated and actual occupant behavior (Blanchard et al 2012).…”
Section: Deep Energy Retrofitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this challenge, the US DOE Building America program established a research agenda targeting market-relevant strategies to achieve 40% reductions in existing home energy use by 2030. Deep energy retrofits are part of the strategy to meet and exceed this goal (Less and Walker 2014;Brennan and Iain 2015). Another method for reducing energy consumption has been focused on closing the performance gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%