2019
DOI: 10.1080/08952841.2019.1700728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis of the association between caregiver burden and the dependent’s illness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these 2 caregiving factors negatively impact caregivers’ self-care [ 5 ], our findings suggest that they may not be relevant to caregivers’ decisions about whether to adopt mHealth apps for self-management. The median time spent caring in our sample (18.3 hours) was lower than the US population average for dementia caregivers (26.3 hours) [ 1 ], although our sample had high levels of burden (mean ZBI score of 21), which reflects the findings of other researchers [ 49 , 71 , 72 ]. Nevertheless, our sample consisted of middle-aged and well-educated caregivers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Although these 2 caregiving factors negatively impact caregivers’ self-care [ 5 ], our findings suggest that they may not be relevant to caregivers’ decisions about whether to adopt mHealth apps for self-management. The median time spent caring in our sample (18.3 hours) was lower than the US population average for dementia caregivers (26.3 hours) [ 1 ], although our sample had high levels of burden (mean ZBI score of 21), which reflects the findings of other researchers [ 49 , 71 , 72 ]. Nevertheless, our sample consisted of middle-aged and well-educated caregivers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Elderly caregivers still cared for even older care receivers, who were not necessarily affected by a specific disease (e.g., Alzheimer’s or other dementias). The age of ICs may be a protective factor against the burden [ 16 , 49 ]; however, the explanatory models showed chronic respiratory diseases and other chronic illnesses may play an essential role in ICs wellbeing. Comorbidities and the aging of ICs are not included in ICs instruction courses; therefore, the physical conditions of ICs have been left out of caregiver educational plans and research but determines their wellbeing as ICs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caregiver research has concentrated on care-receivers diseases [ 11 , 12 , 13 ]. A recent meta-analysis suggested that the burden of ICs based on specific care-receiver diseases made sense in two groups: mental illness and physical impairment [ 49 ]. Furthermore, the conceptual model of the caregiver burden emerged from the case of dementia, and thereafter has not been adapted (e.g., by adding more general items) to ICs’ general conditions [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of 125 studies by Rodriguez-Gonzales and Rodríguez-Míguez [29] showed that caregivers of individuals with a physical disability have an estimated mean ZCBS score of 27. The lower score in this study might be due to the shorter duration of care in the hospital and the potential for recovery in the patients who receive care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the statements is answered using a Likert-type scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 4 (never, rarely, sometimes, quite frequently, and nearly always). The composite score was then calculated, and the burden was graded as follows: little or no burden (≤20), mild burden (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40), moderate to severe burden (41-60), and severe burden (>61-88). The ZCBS has good internal consistency reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of .92.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%