A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Interactive Middle School Cannabis Prevention Programs

Abstract

This meta-analysis examines the effectiveness of interactive middle school-based drug prevention programs on adolescent cannabis use in North America, as well as program characteristics that could moderate these effects. Interactive programs, compared to more didactic, lecture style programs, involve participants in skill-building activities and focus on interaction among participants. A systematic literature search was conducted for English-language studies from January 1998 to March 2014. Studies included evaluations using random assignment or a quasi-experimental design of interactive school-based substance use prevention programs delivered to adolescents (aged 12–14) in North American middle schools (grades 6–8). Data were extracted using a coding protocol. The outcomes of interest were post-treatment cannabis use, intent to use, and refusal skills compared across intervention and control groups. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) were calculated from continuous measures, and dichotomous measures were converted to the d index. A total of 30 studies yielding 23 independent samples were included. The random effects pooled effect size for cannabis use (k=21) was small (d̄=−0.07, p<0.01) and favorable for the prevention programs. The pooled effect sizes for intention to use (k=3) and refusal skills (k=3) were not significant. Moderator analyses indicated significant differences in program effectiveness between instructor types, with teachers found to be most effective (d̄ =−0.08, p=0.02). The findings provide further support for the use of interactive school-based programs to prevent cannabis use among middle school students in North America.

Research Review: What have we learned about adolescent substance use?

“…Most commonly, programs have been developed and evaluated in school, family, and community settings. Evidence is mixed amid heterogeneity of methodology and outcomes between studies, but there is some support for parenting-focused (Allen et al, 2016), school-based teacher-led (Lize et al, 2017), and peer-led prevention programs (MacArthur, Harrison, Caldwell, Hickman, & Campbell, 2016).…”

Cannabis education: Prevalence and socio-demographic correlates among Ontario middle and high school students

“…5 To help facilitate the increase in cannabis education, it will be important to focus on the strategic approach in delivery and the specific content to be addressed. Systematic reviews [8][9][10] have concluded that approaches to delivering cannabis content are more effective in reaching adolescents and limiting use when: digital-based (e.g., social media); facilitated by a non-teacher; frequent and factual; and peer and family member-engaging. Furthermore, applying scare tactics, the "just say no" approach, and over-assertions of cannabis' harms (e.g., emphasizing causation over risk) are cautioned against.…”

Educational Intervention Program for Coping with Youth Cyberbullying, Based on Bystanders' Involvement

“…The literature has indicated many of the programs that are effective in preventing various risk behaviors in adolescence are delivered by teachers trained prior to the implementation of the intervention program. Studies show programs implemented by the educational staff/teachers are more effective than programs delivered by an external mentor or supervisor who is not part of the school staff (Lize et al, 2017;Gá zquez, 2010;Waschbusch et al, 2018). Intervention programs delivered by school staff as part of the school's curriculumroutine have a longer-term chance of implementation and preservation.…”