2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis of the n-back task while driving and its effects on cognitive workload

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solís Marcos et al also demonstrated that performance is not be impaired when there is simultaneous performing of tasks that do not use the same mental resources, such as auditory and visual tasks (Solís Marcos and Kircher 2019). Another study (von Janczewski et al 2021) has obtained conflicting results and reported that forward velocity, the standard deviation of forward velocity and steering wheel variability measures are not sensitive to cognitive load. A reason for these conflicting data could be the shorter driving period in simulation-based studies compare to a real driving test and reduce the effect of fatigue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Solís Marcos et al also demonstrated that performance is not be impaired when there is simultaneous performing of tasks that do not use the same mental resources, such as auditory and visual tasks (Solís Marcos and Kircher 2019). Another study (von Janczewski et al 2021) has obtained conflicting results and reported that forward velocity, the standard deviation of forward velocity and steering wheel variability measures are not sensitive to cognitive load. A reason for these conflicting data could be the shorter driving period in simulation-based studies compare to a real driving test and reduce the effect of fatigue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the relationship between subjective workload and driving performance indicators, some studies have used steering wheel angle (Brookhuis et al 2009;von Janczewski et al 2021) in the driving simulator to estimate driver performance and even to find a possible effect of this factor on MWL. Driving on a maze road causes slower mean speed, more variability in lane position, and the number of steering wheel corrections increased, which suggest a higher level of driver's workload (Hamish Jamson and Merat, 2005;Faure, Lobjois and Benguigui, 2016).…”
Section: Road Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For excitation purposes, one may design and perform experiments to help the subjects with enhancing their arousal state. In this regard, we can suggest to perform memory-related tasks [59] and analyze the effects of safe actuation helpful in elevating their arousal levels. In these experiments, subjects should fully engage with the tasks.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Driving simulation" remains as the main method from the beginning of this field up to now [65,66]. In simulation, surrogate driving tasks such as LCT (lane change task) and BT (box task) could be adopted to mimic driving [67,68], and tools like visual occlusion and nback task could be employed for distraction imitation [69,70]. "Naturalistic driving study" (NDS) provides insight into this issue under natural driving conditions [71].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%