2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2004.00158.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta‐analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth

Abstract: Agenesis differs by continent and gender: the prevalence for both sexes was higher in Europe (males 4.6%; females 6.3%) and Australia (males 5.5%; females 7.6%) than for North American Caucasians (males 3.2%; females 4.6%). In addition, the prevalence of dental agenesis in females was 1.37 times higher than in males. The mandibular second premolar was the most affected tooth, followed by the maxillary lateral incisor and the maxillary second premolar. The occurrence of dental agenesis was divided into three ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

82
818
21
94

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 813 publications
(1,015 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
82
818
21
94
Order By: Relevance
“…9,24 Moreover, the predisposition of 'second teeth' agenesis pattern -upper second incisors, upper and lower second premolars and upper and lower second molars -is present in most patients which is in accordance with the findings described by Polder et al in 2004. 1 Profile analysis was performed on both intra-and extra oral 2D photographs as well as facial 3D stereophotogrammetric images. Looking at the common 3D facial features we noticed that all affected individuals with severe TA in these four unrelated families show a dished-in maxillofacial appearance and a mildly retruded mandible, pointing to decreased jaw and alveolar bone growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9,24 Moreover, the predisposition of 'second teeth' agenesis pattern -upper second incisors, upper and lower second premolars and upper and lower second molars -is present in most patients which is in accordance with the findings described by Polder et al in 2004. 1 Profile analysis was performed on both intra-and extra oral 2D photographs as well as facial 3D stereophotogrammetric images. Looking at the common 3D facial features we noticed that all affected individuals with severe TA in these four unrelated families show a dished-in maxillofacial appearance and a mildly retruded mandible, pointing to decreased jaw and alveolar bone growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the tooth type and number of teeth involved, the prevalence of TA ranges from 10 to 30% for TA of third molars to 0.2% for severe TA of six teeth or more (excluding the third molars). 1 An overall incidence of TA of permanent teeth excluding third molars of 2.6-11.3% was reported, depending on demographic and geographic profiles. 1 As tooth formation shares mechanisms with the development of other ectodermal appendages, TA often occurs as part of a variety of ectodermal dysplasia (ED) syndromes including Witkop syndrome, hypohydrotic ectodermal dysplasia, odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia (OODD), Schöpf-Schulz-Passarge syndrome (SSPS) and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3 In humans, multiple MSX1 mutations have been identified in families exhibiting Mendelian inheritance of an oligodontia phenotype (either non-syndromic or syndromic). [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] However, MSX1 also clearly affects the common human oral cleft phenotypes, as demonstrated through multiple genetic studies. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Yet, in all but a single case report, 5 MSX1 apparently functions as a complex disease determinant for oral clefting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The prevalence is higher in Europe and Australia than in North America, females are affected about 1.4 times more than males and bilateral absence is more common than the unilateral scenario. 2 The data on hypodontia suggests that it follows an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance with incomplete penetrance. 3 The maxillary lateral incisor is the third most frequent devel opmentally absent tooth after third molars and mandibular second premolars 2 and its absence can also occur in a number of conditions such as ectodermal dysplasia, cleft lip and palate, Down's Syndrome, Incontinentia pigmenti and following early irradiation of tooth germs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%