1989
DOI: 10.1086/461601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Class Size and Achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on the relationship between class size and students' achievement, as opposed to mathematics self-efficacy, suggest that class size is a significant variable that affects students' achievement. While some studies (Boozer & Rouse, 2001;Hedges & Stock, 1983;McGiverin, Gilman, & Tillitski, 1989) suggest that lower class size has a positive contribution on achievement, some emphasize that although lower class size provides advantages for teachers and students, achievement cannot be increased effectively by simply decreasing class size ( Hanushek 1999;Lockheed & Komenan, 1989;Molnar et al, 1999). Furthermore, it is also suggested that for students attending classes with lower size, there is lower probability to fail the class or to drop out of school and that there are more advantages for students in classes of smaller size (Hattie, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the relationship between class size and students' achievement, as opposed to mathematics self-efficacy, suggest that class size is a significant variable that affects students' achievement. While some studies (Boozer & Rouse, 2001;Hedges & Stock, 1983;McGiverin, Gilman, & Tillitski, 1989) suggest that lower class size has a positive contribution on achievement, some emphasize that although lower class size provides advantages for teachers and students, achievement cannot be increased effectively by simply decreasing class size ( Hanushek 1999;Lockheed & Komenan, 1989;Molnar et al, 1999). Furthermore, it is also suggested that for students attending classes with lower size, there is lower probability to fail the class or to drop out of school and that there are more advantages for students in classes of smaller size (Hattie, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental and control teachers and their classrooms were preselected to be similar and we largely controlled for student inequivalence and other threats to internal validity using a non-equivalent pre-test-post-test control group design. Research on class size (Canadian Council on Learning, 2005;McGiverin, Gilman, & Tillitski, 1989;Smith & Glass, 1980) shows positive effects on learning only when class sizes are quite small. Finally, using technology for learning, especially when the technology is intended to support the process of student self-regulation, is not a straightforward teaching strategy to master and its difficulty may help to explain teacher attrition and why some effects were insignificant.…”
Section: Cautions and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of education, meta-analysis has been used to assess the relation between classroom size and achievement (e.g., McGiverin, Gilman, & Tillitski, 1989) and to examine the efficacy of mainstreaming programs for special education students (e.g., Wang & Baker, 1985). In the medical sciences, meta-analysis has been used in multiple areas including, for example, an examination of the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening (McCaul, Branstetter, Schroeder, Glasgow, 1996).…”
Section: Popularity and Increased Usage Of Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%