1984
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1984.4277608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Individual Job Satisfaction and Individual Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
153
1
19

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 421 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
153
1
19
Order By: Relevance
“…These researchers found support for the performance-causes-satisfaction theory. However, Petty et al (1984) found that this relationship may be moderated by job level since stronger relationships were found for employees at higher levels in the organization. Vanderberg and Lance (1992) tested four hypotheses for job satisfaction: commitment causes satisfaction, satisfaction causes commitment, commitment and satisfaction are reciprocally related, and there is no causal relationship.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These researchers found support for the performance-causes-satisfaction theory. However, Petty et al (1984) found that this relationship may be moderated by job level since stronger relationships were found for employees at higher levels in the organization. Vanderberg and Lance (1992) tested four hypotheses for job satisfaction: commitment causes satisfaction, satisfaction causes commitment, commitment and satisfaction are reciprocally related, and there is no causal relationship.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Researchers studied whether satisfaction causes performance (Vroom, 1964;Schwab and Cummings, 1970;Filley et al, 1976;Organ, 1977) or whether performance causes satisfaction (Brayfield and Crockett, 1955;Vroom, 1964;Lawler and Porter, 1967). According to Petty et al (1984), by the mid-1980s, the issue still had not been resolved. These researchers found support for the performance-causes-satisfaction theory.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job satisfaction is defined as a positive and pleasurable state resulting from an individual’s job appraisal or job experience (Locke, 1976). Job satisfaction is a dominant subject in organizational research due to its importance for individual and organizational health and well-being, and continued functioning, which has been well established (for reviews, see: Petty et al, 1984; Iaffaldano and Muchinsky, 1985; Loher et al, 1985; Blegen, 1993; Brown and Peterson, 1993; Judge et al, 2002; Faragher et al, 2005; Zangaro and Soeken, 2007), making it by far the most examined construct in organizational literature (Spector, 1997). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These combined conditions appear to have led to increased supervisor ambiguity, which has negatively impacted upon the affective commitment of nurses. This is a major concern for managers regarding retaining those healthcare workers in short supply, such as nurses and doctors, because previous research has identifi ed the signifi cant relationship between organisational effectiveness and turnover (Goris et al, 2000;Petty, McGee, & Cavender, 1998). Further, according to Drucker (2006) and Covey (2006), control management practices traditionally used in bureaucratic organisations are not congenial for retaining professionals whose skills and knowledge provide them with greater employment alternatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%