2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis on the effect of environmental enrichment on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that, despite the stressors administered, the housing conditions of the birds in the present study were more enriched than the housing environment of birds in commercial systems. Indeed, a lower frequency of SFP is observed in flocks benefiting from enrichment 89 . Between 10 and 13 woa, the stressed birds had limited access to perches and nest boxes, but these items were not entirely restricted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is possible that, despite the stressors administered, the housing conditions of the birds in the present study were more enriched than the housing environment of birds in commercial systems. Indeed, a lower frequency of SFP is observed in flocks benefiting from enrichment 89 . Between 10 and 13 woa, the stressed birds had limited access to perches and nest boxes, but these items were not entirely restricted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This finding emphasizes the importance of enough litter and regular litter renewal for the prevention of SFP [ 31 ]. Environmental enrichment in the litter area, such as straw bales or pecking blocks, may have an additional positive effect [ 39 , 72 ]. We found a correlation between SFP and AP throughout the laying period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a negative correlation was found between litter pecking and SFP in connection with raised anxiety level in hens [ 38 ]. A meta-analysis confirmed the positive effect of environmental enrichment on the reduction of SFP [ 39 ]. The extent of plumage damage due to SFP also varies between hybrid lines [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One of the possible strategies to improve hen health and welfare is to modify their rearing environments, and several alternatives to the conventional cage system have been developed such as enriched cage system (consisting of a nest, litter bath or scratch area, perches, and abrasive strip) and cage-free systems with or without outdoor access such as aviaries (single- and multiple-tiered) [ 59 ]. Although hens housed in the enriched cage system and non-cage systems seem to be possible ways to improve their welfare by displaying some degree of “natural” behavior such as nesting, roosting, and scratching [ 60 , 61 ], there is a high risk of increased exhibition of injurious behavior (feather pecking, aggression, and cannibalism) resulting from large group sizes and social instability [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 62 , 63 ]. Social stress and associated injurious behavior are major concerns in all current housing environments including cage and cage-free systems [ 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Production Environments and Related Stress In Commercial Lay...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, BT causes tissue damage, which may increase somatosensory sensitization of the damaged nerve tissues, resulting in pain (acute, chronic or both) in the trimmed birds [ 31 , 39 , 40 ]. Both enriched-caging and free-range production systems have been developed to meet the chickens’ ‘natural’ behavioral needs, however, injurious behavior still occurs within the flocks, and other management strategies must be implemented [ 32 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. With the growing public concern for laying hen health and welfare, there is a pressing need to identify and develop alternatives to BT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%